检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周叶中[1] 汪雨涵 ZHOU Ye-zhong;WANG Yu-han(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第4期25-32,共8页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:在一般观念及以往的研究中,法官的责任常被简单地等同于审判责任。但是,在全面准确落实司法责任制与加快建设法治社会的要求下,法官的责任在事实上超出了审判责任的范围。在新时代法治建设的中国,法官具有多重角色定位,履行不同性质的义务,因此也就承担着多重责任。作为司法审判者,法官承担基于审判职责的职务责任;作为公务员,法官负有政治义务,承担相应的政治责任;作为社会治理的参与者、法治社会的建设者,法官当然地也负有相应的社会义务,承担相应的社会责任。In the general concept and previous studies,the judge's responsibility is often simply equated with the responsibility of the trial.However,under the requirements of fully and accurately implementing the judicial responsibility system and accelerating the construction of a society ruled by law,the responsibilities of judges in fact goes beyond the scope of judicial responsibility.In the new era of the construction of the rule of law in China,judges have multiple roles and fulfill different obligations,so they also bear multiple responsibilities.As judicial adjudicators,judges assume the responsibilities of duty based on judicial duties;as civil servants,judges have political obligations and bear corresponding political responsibilities;as participants in social governance and builders of a society ruled by law,judges also have corresponding social obligations,and undertake corresponding social responsibilities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.48.34