检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王语 白娇 宋惠贞 谢娟 黄梦萍 舒健 WANG Yu;BAI Jiao;SONG Huizhen(Department of Radiology,The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan Province 646099,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]西南医科大学附属医院放射科,泸州646099
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2023年第5期812-817,共6页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的对比T_(2)mapping、T_(2)^(*)mapping成像在鉴别宫颈癌类型、分化程度、预测淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSl)的价值。方法对51例经病理证实的宫颈癌患者于治疗前行常规MR、T_(2)mapping和T_(2)^(*)mapping检查,测量肿瘤和正常子宫肌层的T_(2)值和T_(2)^(*)值。对比测量参数在肿瘤与正常子宫肌层、鳞癌与腺癌、高分化、中分化与低分化、LVSI阳性与LVSI阴性之间的差别,绘制ROC曲线,评价诊断效能。结果宫颈癌肿瘤与正常子宫肌层之间T_(2)值、T_(2)^(*)值差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.001),鳞癌与腺癌之间T_(2)值、T_(2)^(*)值差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),低分化组T_(2)值和T_(2)^(*)值均低于中分化组和高分化组(P值均<0.05),中分化组和高分化组之间T_(2)值、T_(2)^(*)值差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。LVSI阳性组T_(2)值和T_(2)^(*)值均明显低于LVSI阴性组(P均<0.05)。T_(2)值、T_(2)^(*)值对于鉴别低分化与中分化、低分化与高分化的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.714、0.727,0.787、0.733。T_(2)值、T_(2)^(*)值预测宫颈癌LVSI的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.650、0.702。结论T_(2)mapping和T_(2)^(*)mapping成像对宫颈癌分化程度的判断具有一定的提示作用,并有潜力应用于宫颈癌LVSI状态的预测。Objective To explore the potential clinical value of T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)mapping technique in the evaluation of pathological type,tumor grade and lymphovascular space invasion(LVSI)of cervical cancer.Methods Totally 51 patients with pathologically proven cervical cancer underwent conventional MRI,T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)mapping before therapy.T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values were obtained and compared between tumor and normal tissue(myometrium),squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas,well、moderately differentiated tumor and poorly differentiated tumor,LVSI-positive and LVSI-negative cervical cancer,respectively.ROC curve was constructed to evaluate diagnostic performances.Results T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values showed significant differences between cervical cancer and normal tissue(both P<0.001).No significant difference was observed in T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas(both P>0.05).Compared to well and moderately differentiated tumors,poorly differentiated tumors showed decreased T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values(both P<0.05).There was no significant difference in T_(2)value and T_(2)^(*)value between to well and moderately differentiated tumors(P>0.05).T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values were significantly lower in LVSI-positive than in LVSI-negative cervical cancer(both P<0.05).The AUC of T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)values for distinguishing poorly differentiated tumors from well and moderately differentiated tumors were O.714.0.727 and 0.787,0.733 respectively.The AUC of T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)value in discriminating the presence of LVS1 was were 0.650and 0.702,respectively.Conclusion Quantitative T_(2)and T_(2)^(*)mapping can putatively differentiate the grade of cervical cancer,and have the potential to predict the LVSI status of cervical cancer.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.33[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249