科学史研究向何处去?——再论科学史学科独立与学术自主  

How Should the Study of the History of Science Proceed?——Retouching on the Independence and Autonomy of the History of Science

作　　者：袁江洋 YUAN Jiangyang(School of Humanities,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学人文学院,北京100049

出　　处：《广西民族大学学报（自然科学版）》2023年第2期10-20,共11页Journal of Guangxi Minzu University ：Natural Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金中国历史研究院重大历史问题研究专项(22VLS017)。

摘　　要：科学史学科因学科内外各种不同的学术思想的碰撞而趋于撕裂,“万花筒之喻”不足以告慰职业科学史家。文章致力于反思科学史与科学哲学、科学(知识)社会学、科学以及历史学之间的学术互动进程,以揭示科学史学科从一开始就存在的、位于学科深层理论层面上的危机,指出欲维护学科完整性和学科自主性,科学史家须重返萨顿理想,发展长时段全球科学史。The integrity of the history of science as an independent discipline is being torn apart by transdisciplinary collisions between ideas indigenous to the discipline with ideas external to it.The kaleidoscope metaphor,which implies that the discipline seems to be well-integrated despite its various tensions,provides no comfort to professional historians of science.This paper is devoted to scrutinizing the process of academic interaction between the history of science,philosophy of science,sociology of science(knowledge),and science and history;it reveals crises originally existent within deep theoretical levels of the history of science from the very beginning,and points out that in order to maintain the integrity and autonomy of the discipline,historians of science should return to Sarton's ideal and develop the long-term global history of science.

关 键 词：科学史理论 跨学科学术互动 萨顿理想 长时段全球科学史 

分 类 号：N09[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]