《新修本草》引文溯源及校正探讨  

Discussion on Source Tracing and Correction of Citations in Tang Materia Medica

作　　者：刘秀峰[1] 王晓晖[1] 谢明[1] LIU Xiufeng;WANG Xiaohui;XIE Ming(Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Dalian Liaoning 116600,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁中医药大学,辽宁大连116600

出　　处：《中医药导报》2023年第7期170-173,共4页Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅项目(L202019);2019年辽宁中医药大学科研项目(2019-lnzy021)。

摘　　要：《新修本草》在药物的考释中开始广泛引用“经史子集”四部文献,共计34种,其中,引用经史文献11种,本草方剂文献共计14种,其他典籍9种。对《新修本草》引文进行溯源可见,现存《新修本草》辑复本引文内容存在部分文献传抄错误、用字错误、断句错误及引用内容同著者注释内容相混等问题,同时引文溯源也有助于更好地了解《新修本草》编撰的历程,更准确地把握《新修本草》的内容。Tang Materia Medica began to extensively cite four documents of the"Confucian classics,history,philosophy and literature"in the research and interpretation of drugs,with a total of 34 kinds,including 11 references to classics and history,14 references to herbal prescriptions,and 9 other classics.By tracing the citations of Tang Materia Medica,it can be seen that there were some problems in the citations of the existing edition of Tang Materia Medica,such as errors in document transmission,word use,sentence segmentation,and mixing of the citations with the author's annotations,etc.At the same time,the citations tracing was also helpful to better understand the compilation process of Tang Materia Medica and grasp the content of Tang Materia Medica more accurately.

关 键 词：《新修本草》 引文 溯源 校正 文献考证 

分 类 号：R281.3[医药卫生—中药学]