检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金春雨[1,2] 徐悦悦 JIN Chunyu;XU Yueyue(Center for Quantitative Economics,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China;School of Business and Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学数量经济研究中心,吉林长春130012 [2]吉林大学商学与管理学院,吉林长春130012
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第4期15-24,36,共11页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(22AJL016)。
摘 要:在扩展的内生经济增长模型框架下,利用SV-TVP-FAVAR模型分析了经济周期不同阶段财政支出结构的优化调整方向。研究结果表明,在经济衰退时期,当引发原因为金融危机时,提高经济建设支出和卫生支出比重的结构优化方向更有效地促进经济恢复,而当引发原因为新冠疫情时,提高卫生支出和文教支出的比重更有效;在经济恢复时期,提高文教支出和卫生支出比重的结构优化方向对经济增长调控更有效;在经济平稳时期,提高经济建设支出和文教支出比重的结构优化方向对经济增长调控更有效。Under the framework of the extended endogenous economic growth model,this paper uses SV-TVP-FAVAR model to analyze the optimization and adjustment direction of fiscal expenditure structure in different stages of the economic cycle.The results show that during the recession caused by the economic crisis,the structural optimization direction of increasing the proportion of economic construction expenditure and health expenditure is more effective in promoting economic recovery.However,when the cause is the COVID-19 Pandemic,it is more effective to increase the proportion of health expenditure,cultural expenditure and educational expenditure.In the period of economic recovery,the structural optimization direction of increasing the proportion of cultural and educational expenditure and health expenditure is more effective in regulating economic growth.In the period of economic stability,the structural optimization direction of increasing the proportion of economic construction expenditure and cultural and educational expenditure is more effective in regulating economic growth.
关 键 词:财政支出结构 经济增长 SV-TVP-FAVAR模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7