合同解除后的返还清算  

On the Winding-up Relationship After Termination of Contract

作　　者：吕斌 LYU Bin(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期116-125,共10页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

摘　　要：《民法典》第566条第1款后半段分别规定了以“恢复原状”“采取其他补救措施”和“赔偿损失”为内容的请求权。作为原权的“恢复原状”请求权是返还清算关系中独有的返还请求权,“采取其他补救措施”请求权和“赔偿损失”请求权则系“恢复原状”请求权的救济权。基于“恢复原状”之规定,返还清算债务人负有以返还原物(价款)及其孳息(利息)为内容的恢复原状义务。基于“采取其他补救措施”之规定,返还清算债务人须根据违反恢复原状义务的不同场景,承担不同责任形态的广义的继续履行责任。基于“赔偿损失”之规定,在恢复原状义务陷于履行不能时,返还清算债务人须承担价值偿还责任。The second half of Article 566(1)in Civil Code respectively provides for the right of claim with the contents of“restitution”,“taking other remedial measures”and“compensation for losses”.The claim right with the content of“restitution”(as a primary right)is a unique right born out of the winding-up relationship after termination of contract,while the claim right with the content of“taking other remedial measures”and the claim right with the content of“compensation for losses”are remedy rights of the claim right with the content of“restitution”.Based on the norm of“restitution”,the obligor in the winding-up relationship after termination of contract has the obligation to return benefits received by performance.Based on the norm of“taking other remedial measures”,the obligor in the winding-up relationship after termination of contract should bear different forms of liability of specific performance in a broad sense according to different circumstances where the obligation of restitution was violated.Based on the norm of“compensation for losses”,the obligor in the winding-up relationship after termination of contract should bear the liability to pay the value of benefit,which is premised on the fact that it is impossible for the obligor to perform the obligation of restitution.

关 键 词：合同解除 “原权/救济权”之二分法 恢复原状义务 价值偿还责任 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]