帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪司法适用的异化与归正  

Alienation and Rectification of Judicial Application for the Crime of Aiding Information Network Criminal Activities

作　　者：曹化 Cao Hua

机构地区：[1]上海市闵行区人民检察院 [2]华东政法大学

出　　处：《青少年犯罪问题》2023年第3期3-17,共15页Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency

摘　　要：在信息网络犯罪领域,帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的频繁适用已成为常态化趋势,但这一激增的司法适用率背后存在诸多隐忧。通过探析帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的司法适用现状,发现涉信息网络犯罪帮助行为的案件定性争议颇大,在罪名认定时,存在帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与关联罪名共犯形态划分不清、“明知”标准认定不一致、“犯罪”标准存在适用误区等困境。为正本清源,通过基本规则、定性准则、划分细则三个维度确立帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与关联罪名共犯形态的界分进路,结合网络犯罪的“积量构罪”的犯罪特征,对于帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪“明知”进行解构,明确其在内容、时间、程度上的基本内涵,立足于体系解释的基本要求,以阶层犯罪论为法理基础,明确“犯罪”的内涵轮廓应以不法行为论为宜。In the field of cybercrime,the frequent application of the crime of aiding information network criminal activities has become the norm,but there are many hidden worries behind it.By analyzing the current situation of judicial application of the crime of aiding information network criminal activities,there are significant controversies over the qualitative nature of related cases.There are difficulties such as unclear division of forms of accomplices in related charges,inconsistent identification of standards with knowing,and misunderstandings in the application of criminal standards.It is necessary to distinguish the forms of accomplices in related charges through three dimensions:basic rules,qualitative rules,and classification rules.Combining the characteristics of cybercrime,it is necessary to deconstruct the knowing of crime of aiding information network criminal activities,and clarify its basic meaning in content,time and degree.Based on the basic requirements of system interpretation and the theory of criminal class,the outline of the crime should be clearly defined.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 片面共犯 明知 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]