侵权责任一般条款的细化设想——基于《民法典》第1165条  

Refined Assumption of the General Clause of Tort Liability-Based on Civil Code Art.1165

作　　者：林承铎[1] Lin Chengduo(International College,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国际学院,北京100872

出　　处：《福州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第4期102-112,171,172,共13页Journal of Fuzhou University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“道路交通事故中侵权责任及第三者责任保险的交互关系研究”(15BFX164)。

摘　　要：我国原《侵权责任法》中的一般条款(第6条)的表述较为简单,表意较为模糊,导致实践中司法机关在适用法律时出现不同的裁判结果。2020年5月28日,全国人大通过的《中华人民共和国民法典》侵权责任编中,关于过错责任(第1165条)与无过错责任(第1166条)的规定基本来自《侵权责任法》,仅在表述上多了“损害”二字。值得注意的是,《民法典》并未单独制定债编总论,侵权责任编基本糅合了债编总论及分编关于侵权责任的规定。因此,对侵权责任一般条款的构成要件该当性进行探讨,在《民法典》施行之后显得尤为重要。The general clause(Article 6)in the previous Tort Liability Law of People's Republic of China is relatively simple and vague.In practice,the judicial system has different judgment results when applying the law.The provisions on fault liability(Article 1165)and non-fault liability(Article 1166)in the tort liability section of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China,adopted by the National People's Congress on May 28,2020,are basically derived from the Tort Liability Law,and only the word"damage"is added to the expression.It is worth noting that the Civil Code does not separately formulate the general theory of the debt section,so the tort liability section basically combines the general theory of the debt section and the provisions on tort liability in the sub section.Therefore,it is particularly important to discuss the appropriateness of the constituent elements of the general provisions of tort liability after the implementation of the Civil Code.

关 键 词：民法典 侵权责任 一般条款 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]