“古今字”内涵异解的学史梳理和学理阐释  

A Survey of the Academic History and Theoretical Interpretation on Diff erent Understanding About the Connotations of Gujinzi(古今字)

作　　者：温敏 WEN Min

机构地区：[1]汉字文明传承传播与教育研究中心 [2]郑州大学文学院

出　　处：《汉字汉语研究》2023年第2期79-94,128,F0003,共18页The Study Of Chinese Characters And Language

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“越南汉字资源整理与研究”(17ZDA308)和“清代《说文》学新材料普查、整理与研究”(21&ZD299);国家社科基金后期资助项目“古今字传承传播与发展研究”(20FYYB028);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“世界文字资源建设”(22JZD033);教育部社科项目(17YJA740054)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：现代研究对传统训诂学术语“古今字”的核心指向义在“历时同词异字”之外存在异解。文章从学史上“古今字”“分别文”“后出字”“后起字”的术语关系中,梳理其内涵义产生异解的过程,以正本清源,明其本旨。同时从学理逻辑学角度,说明产生这种异解的原因,可以概括为不同视角下同一材料具多维属性不等于概念的同一或对立。In modern research,there are different interpretations of the core meaning of the traditional exegetical term gujinzi(古今字)beyond“historical variants of the same word”.This article teases out how these diff erent understandings came into being from the history of Chinese Philology by researching the relationships among gujinzi(古今字),fenbiewen(分别文),houchuzi(后出字)and houqizi(后起字)so as to clarify the meaning of gujinzi(古今字).From the perspective of theoretical logic,this article points out the reasons for these diff erent understandings.It can be summarized as the fact that the multidimensional properties of the same material under diff erent perspectives do not equal to the identity or the oppositoin of concepts.

关 键 词：古今字 分别文 后起字 

分 类 号：H12[语言文字—汉语]