“还原本义”与“强制解读”——《关雎》主旨学案新断  

"Restoring the Original Meaning"and"Compulsory Interpretation":A New Interpretation of the Theme of Guanju

作　　者：姜剑云[1] JIANG Jian-yun(College of Literature,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China)

机构地区：[1]河北大学文学院,河北保定071000

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第4期80-86,共7页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：《关雎》主旨到底是什么,众说纷纭,莫衷一是。其实,“诗经学”史上,“强制解读”现象相当严重,就《关雎》主旨而言,“还原本义”还得从深究其关键字句入手。正确解析“雎鸠”“荇菜”“流”“芼”以及“左右”“琴瑟”,方可还原《关雎》之情歌恋曲场景。在千年历史长河中,已然形成了《关雎》文化考古中的“《关雎》文化堆积层”。基于对文本解读习惯与动机的理论剖析,通过对《关雎》主旨迷案的认真清理和重审,可以结案判决“恋情说”“赞美说”“讽刺说”“贺婚说”四大类主旨说之得失是非。"studies of The Book of Songs",the phenomenon of"compulsory interpretation"is quite serious.As far as the theme of Guanju is concerned,""restoring the original meaning"still needs to start with a careful study of its key words and sentences.In order to restore the scene of love songs in Guanju,we should correctly analyze"Jujiu","Xingcai","Liu","Mao","Zuoyou"and"Qinse".In the long history of thousands of years,the"cultural accumulation layer of Guanju"has been formed in the cultural archaeology of Guanju.Based on the theoretical analysis of the habit and motivation of text interpretation,and through the careful sorting and review of the case of Guanju's theme myth,we can conclude and judge the merits and demerits of four kinds of theme theories:"love theory","praise theory",‘satire theory"and"marriage congratulation theory".

关 键 词：《关雎》主旨 疑案新断 还原本义 强制解读 

分 类 号：I207.222[文学—中国文学]