虚假不礼貌视角下基于亲密关系的网络调侃语用研究  被引量:1

Pragmatic Study on Online Teasing in Chinese Intimate Relationships from the Perspective of Mock Impoliteness

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:白丽梅[1] 王玥 Bai Limei;Wang Yue(College of Foreign Languages&Literature,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou Gansu 730070,China)

机构地区:[1]西北师范大学外国语学院,甘肃兰州730070

出  处:《天水师范学院学报》2023年第3期81-89,共9页Journal of Tianshui Normal University

摘  要:作为一种普遍的交流方式,调侃属于虚假不礼貌范畴。借助质性分析软件NVivo12对200例涉及调侃的微信会话进行分析,呈现亲密关系中的调侃方式及其应答方式。在虚假不礼貌的框架下,调侃方式分为正讽性和反讽性调侃,前者包括非策略性、赞同性、慷慨性、褒奖性调侃;后者包括策略性、吝啬性、反对性、同情性、诋毁性调侃。调侃具有情感功能、工具功能和人际功能。调侃应答方式可分为攻击性和防御性应答。调侃既是一种供群体娱乐的工具,也是实现互动融洽的手段,是社会生活中不可缺少的交际言语行为。Based on 200 conversations in Wechat,this paper explores the types of teasing and interlocutors' responses in intimate relationship with the aid of NVivo 12 from the perspective of mock impoliteness.The results show that in communication there are two types of teasing:positive irony and negative irony.The former includes tactless,consentient,generous and approbative teasing;the latter includes tactic,mean,opposed,sympathetic and critical teasing,which can fulfill affective,instrumental and interpersonal functions.Additionally,responses to teasing can be classified as offensive and defensive responses.It is shown that teasing,as an indispensable speech act in communication,is not only a tool for group entertainment,but a means to achieve harmonious interaction rapport.

关 键 词:虚假不礼貌 微信 调侃 亲密关系 

分 类 号:H136[语言文字—汉语]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象