检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚新蜀[1] 李丹怡 Gong Xinshu;Li Danyi(School of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi Xinjiang 832000,China)
机构地区:[1]石河子大学经济与管理学院,新疆石河子832000
出 处:《统计与决策》2023年第14期93-99,共7页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(21XMZ062);文化名家暨“四个一批”人才工程、万人计划哲学社会科学领军人才(中宣办发[2017]25号);新疆生产建设兵团社会科学基金资助项目(21ZD03)。
摘 要:文章从人民、共享、发展、可持续四个维度构建共同富裕评价指标体系,基于熵权-TOPSIS法从省域层面测度了2011—2020年我国共同富裕发展水平,并对其时空演变、区域差异特征和障碍度进行分析。结果表明:2011—2020年我国共同富裕发展水平呈上升趋势,但总体发展水平较低且区域间存在显著差异,呈现“东部—东北—中部—西部”依次递减的阶梯状发展格局。不同省份之间共同富裕发展具有显著空间正相关性和空间集聚特征,但区域分布逐渐固化;空间关系显著地区以“低-低”集聚模式为主。经济发展效率低、分配制度不健全、物质财富差距大是新时代背景下阻碍中国共同富裕发展的主要因素。This paper constructs an evaluation index system of common prosperity from four dimensions:people,sharing,de-velopment and sustainability.Based on entropy-TOPSIS method,this paper measures the development level of common prosperity in China from 2011 to 2020 at the provincial level,and analyzes its spatial-temporal evolution,regional differences and obstacles.The results show that the development level of common prosperity in China is on the rise from 2011 to 2020,but the overall devel-opment level is low and there are significant differences among regions,showing a ladder pattern of“eastern region-northeast re-gion-central region-western region”.The common prosperity development of different provinces has a significant spatial posi-tive correlation and spatial agglomeration characteristics,but the regional distribution is gradually solidified;The regions with sig-nificant spatial relationship are dominated by low-low agglomeration pattern.Low efficiency of economic development,imperfect distribution system and large gap of material wealth are the main factors hindering China’s development of common prosperity in the new era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.51.7