检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈佳宁 CHEN Jia-ning(Law school,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100089)
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第4期25-31,共7页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:责令改正因其特有的灵活性和实效性特征,成为了行政机关在社会管理过程中广泛使用的执法手段,2021年修订的《行政处罚法》对责令类行政处罚的扩容规定也体现了这一点。但与此同时,责令改正的性质缺乏共识,使得其存在法律规范难以界定,法律适用混乱的问题,进而影响了责令改正的价值实现。因此,以现有的法律规范为基础,对责令改正的类型进行梳理,进而对“适用于行政处罚做出之前”与“适用于行政处罚作出之时”责令改正的不同性质进行探讨。最终明确责令改正的实体规范、规范责令改正的执行程序,推动实现责令改正的应有价值。As a law enforcement means of administrative organs in the process of social management,order correction is frequently used,and a large number of normative documents regulate it.This is also reflected in the provisions on the expansion of ordered administrative punishment in the administrative punishment law of the People’s Republic of China revised in 2021.However,at the same time,the academic community has not yet formed a systematic consensus on the nature and types of ordered correction.This has led to a chaotic situation in China’s legal regulation of it,and also led to chaotic use and abuse in the process of law enforcement.It not only infringes the protection of administrative counterpart,but also affects the credibility of administrative law enforcement organs.Therefore,this paper will try to analyze the law enforcement context of order to correct,discuss the behavior nature of order to correct,and on this basis,standardize the legal provisions of order to correct,make the order to correct system get good application and operation from the aspects of legislation and law enforcement,and realize the due value of order correction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.149.79