低碳转型与风险沟通中的信任缺失:基于江门反核事件的分析  

Social Distrust and its Antecedents in Risk Communication: A Case Study of an Anti-Nuclear Movement in China

作　　者：邓理峰 Lifeng Deng(School of Journalism and Communication,Sun Yat-sen University)

机构地区：[1]中山大学新闻传播学院

出　　处：《全球传媒学刊》2023年第2期101-127,共27页Global Journal of Media Studies

摘　　要：本研究以文本数据挖掘和内容分析为研究方法,对2013年7月在我国广东江门反核事件过程中搜集到的五千多份表达反对意见的电邮和一千多个电话展开分析,并综合比较媒体报道、关键人物的深度访谈等数据,对江门事件中核电风险沟通中的不信任及其成因作了剖析。研究发现,在江门事件的风险沟通中,在事实层面事实供给不足、另类事实泛滥及弱关系链第三方背书效应,在组织层面对风险沟通机构的能力和善意之消极感知,在社会文化和制度环境层面价值观冲突和信用赤字累积,是导致社会不信任的主要因素。本研究还对社会不信任成因中的社会情境因素作了讨论,提出政治结构中的制度化及制度有效运行的组织保障,社会结构中的贫富差距、价值观差异和沉积的信任文化,以及政治与社会结构之间的交互影响,是社会不信任形成过程中重要的结构性情境因素。As a case study on the anti-nuclear event happened in Jiangmen City,Guangdong Province in July 2013,this paper explores into how social distrust was expressed and constituted among the publics.The author found there are three aspects of the antecedents to social distrust.The first one is categorized as the fact dimension,including the disfunction of information transparency,alternative facts produced and disseminated by the protesters online and offline,and the endorsing effect of the weak ties between the sources of alternative facts and its recipients.The second one is the organizational dimension,including the negative perceptions on the capability and benevolence of the local government and the corporation which also is the owner of this industrial project.The third one is the social cultural and institutional environment dimension,including social values difference among the risk communicators and the residents,and trust deficit sedimented from past polluted industrial projects.

关 键 词：核电 风险沟通 社会不信任 

分 类 号：G212[文化科学—新闻学] D630[政治法律—政治学]