基于AHP和TOPSIS法的电采暖综合效益评价方法研究  

Research on comprehensive benefit evaluation of electric heating based on AHP and TOPSIS method

作　　者：张泽亚 安佳坤 周兴华 孙鹏飞 容春艳 魏玲[3] Zhang Zeya;An Jiakun;Zhou Xinghua;Sun Pengfei;Rong Chunyan;Wei Ling(Economic and Technological Research Institute,State Grid Hebei Electric Power Supply Co.,Ltd.,Shijiazhuang 050000,China;Beijing Join Bright Digital Power Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100085,China;Department of Electrical Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]国网河北省电力有限公司经济技术研究院,石家庄050000 [2]北京中恒博瑞数字电力科技有限公司,北京100085 [3]清华大学电机系,北京100084

出　　处：《电测与仪表》2023年第8期92-96,104,共6页Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation

基　　金：国网河北省电力有限公司科技项目(SGHEJY00G HJS1900022)。

摘　　要：在许多供暖方式评价文章中由于评价角度不同,所得结论并不能完全适应人们的不同需要。为此,文章结合层次分析法和TOPSIS法,构建了评估“电采暖”项目综合效益的评价指标体系,进而得到综合评价模型,从经济性、舒适性、可靠性及当地政策等方面进行论证,对常用四种电采暖方式进行分析评价,得出在不同地区、不同气候、不同的环境条件下最优供暖方式的评价模型,并以某市为例进行评价得出针对某市的最优供暖方式,得出一般模型,供用户选用参考。Many articles on the evaluation of heating methods have different evaluation angles,so the conclusions obtained cannot fully meet the different needs of people.To this end,this paper combines the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) method to construct an evaluation index system to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of the "electric heating" project,and then,a comprehensive evaluation model is obtained,which demonstrates from the aspects of economy,comfort,reliability,and local policies.An evaluation model of the optimal heating method in different regions,different climates,and different environmental conditions is obtained through analyzing and evaluating the four commonly used electric heating methods.Finally,taking a city as an example,the optimal heating method for a city is obtained to get a general model for users to choose for reference.

关 键 词：“电采暖”项目 综合效益比较 层次分析法(AHP) 评价指标法(TOPSIS) 

分 类 号：TM925[电气工程—电力电子与电力传动]