傅斯年在“中华民族是一个”讨论中的关键作用  

The Key Role of Fu Sinian in the Discussion of“The Chinese Nation is One”

作　　者：娄贵品[1] LOU Guipin(Department of History,Yunnan University,Kunming,Yunnan,China 650091)

机构地区：[1]云南大学历史系,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2023年第4期67-73,共7页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：傅斯年是“中华民族是一个”讨论背后最重要的角色。不但顾颉刚之《中华民族是一个》是受其规劝而作,而且在费孝通写信反驳后,顾先生分两次发表的《续论“中华民族是一个”:答费孝通先生》,一为按傅先生的意见重作并修改,一为根据傅先生提供的材料写成,对讨论的进程和结果起了关键作用。因此,顾先生虽然冲锋在前,但是体现的主要是幕后的傅斯年之意图。这次讨论反映了当时我国哲学社会科学研究中存在的借鉴与创新的普遍性问题,有助于我们认识中国哲学社会科学研究的历史与现状,进而揭示其历史与文化根源,从而更好地实现构建中国特色的哲学社会科学体系。Fu Sinian is the most important role behind the discussion of“The Chinese nation is one”,not only Gu Jiegang's The Chinese Nation is one was advised by him,but also after Fei Xiaotong s letter rebuttal,Mr.Gu published two Continuous Discussion of The Chinese Nation is one:Reply to Mr.Fei Xiaotong.The first one was rewritten and revised according to Mr.Fu's opinions,and the other one was written according to the materials provided by Mr.Fu,which decided the process and results of the discussion.Therefore,although Mr.Gu led the charge,his works mainly reflects Fu's intention.The discussion shows the contemporary common problems of use and reference in our philosophy and social sciences research for us to better realize the history and status of our philosophy and social sciences research,to reveal its historical and cultural origin and to construct the philosophy and social sciences system with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：中华民族是一个 中华民族共同体 傅斯年 顾颉刚 关键作用 

分 类 号：C956[社会学—民族学] K26[历史地理—历史学]