论中国式数据治理的法律逻辑  

On the Legal Logic of China's Data Governance

作　　者：何渊[1] He Yuan

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《数字法治》2023年第3期46-66,共21页DIGITAL LAW

基　　金：2021年度国家社科基金项目“人脸识别的法律治理框架研究”(项目编号:21BFX034)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：面对数字社会中形成的数据主体客体化以及不平等数据关系等问题,尤其是“技术反冲”带来的数据侵权、数据泄露、数据伦理、数据垄断及国家数据能力等数据生产异化问题,主流的数据权利保护理论并无力解决。因此,中国式数据治理应当超越“告知—同意”规则,突破个人与企业之间的封闭且静态法律框架,并从形式维度、利益维度、价值维度及实施维度等角度进行重构。其中的关系治理不仅涉及个人和企业之间的横向数据关系,还涉及个人和社会之间的纵向数据关系,而在这些数据关系中的公共利益则应当处于优先地位。与此同时,中国式数据治理还强调数据关系中各主体之间形成信任关系,并通过多方和多元的合作治理机制去真正实施落地。The mainstream data rights protection theory is incapable of solving such problems as the objectification of data subjects and unequal data relationship formed in the digital society,It especially has difficulty in solving the alienation problem of data production,such as data in-fringement,data leakage,data ethics,data monopoly and national data capacity,etc.which are brought about by“technological backlash”.Therefore,China's data governance should go beyond the“inform-consent”rule,break through the closed static legal framework between individuals and enterprises,and be reconstructed from the form,benefit,value,and implementation dimen-sions.The regulation on relationship involves not only horizontal data relationship between indi-viduals and enterprises,but also vertical data relationship between individuals and the society,a-mong which the public interest should take precedence.Meanwhile,China's data governance also emphasizes building the trust among various subjects in the data relationship,and implementing a multi-party and diversified cooperative mechanism.

关 键 词：中国式数据治理 关系治理 公益优先 信任治理 合作治理 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]