寻找“去象征化”的可能——基于《爸爸爸》的版本修改  

Looking for the Possibility of“De-symbolization”——Based on the Revision of Dad Dad Dad

作　　者：熊高蝶 XIONG Gao-die(School of Chinese and Literature,Hubei University,Wuhan 430026,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北大学文学院,武汉430026

出　　处：《湖北第二师范学院学报》2023年第7期34-40,共7页Journal of Hubei University of Education

摘　　要：韩少功的小说《爸爸爸》是新时期“寻根”文学思潮中的一个典型文本,他的“寻根”思想至始至终贯穿着这部作品。《爸爸爸》初次发表于1985年,后作者又于2006年将其做了大面积的修改。对两个版本进行文本细读,对比两者在人物形象、叙述基调、文化面貌等方面的差异,可看到这些差异造成了文本主题朝温情化、审美化方向转变。结合版本修改后学术界对《爸爸爸》批评话语的转变,考察“去象征化”阐释的可能,以补充学界将之批判为“国民劣根性”的单一化论调,将批评视野拉回到“寻根”意义上的巫楚传统民间文化所蕴含的审美价值。Han Shaogong’s novel Dad Dad Dad is a typical text in the“root-seeking”literary trend of thought in the new era,and his“root-seeking”thought runs through this work from beginning to end.Dad Dad Dad was first published in 1985,and it was revised extensively by the author in 2006.Through careful reading of the two versions of the text and comparing the differences between the two versions in the aspects of character image,narrative tone,cultural outlook,etc.,we can see that these differences have caused the theme of the text to change towards warmth and aesthetics.In combination with the change of the academic circles'critical discourse on Dad Dad Dad after the revision of the edition,the possibility of“de-symbolization”interpretation is investigated to supplement the academic circles’single argument of criticizing it as“the root of the nation”,and to draw the critical perspective back to the aesthetic value contained in the traditional folk culture of Wuchu in the sense of“root-seeking”.

关 键 词：《爸爸爸》 版本修改 去象征化 寻根 

分 类 号：I207.425[文学—中国文学]