曹操政权中汝颍士人经济生活风尚考论  

A Study on the Economic Life Fashion of Ru-Ying Scholars in Cao Cao Regime

作　　者：杨强[1] YANG Qiang(WeiJin Culture Research Institute,Xuchang University,Xuchang 461000,China)

机构地区：[1]许昌学院魏晋文化研究所,河南许昌461000

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期61-65,共5页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2023年度河南省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目(2023-ZDJH-415);2023年度许昌学院科研重点项目(2023ZD009)。

摘　　要：曹操政权中存在两大政治集团,一为汝颍士人集团,一为谯沛士人集团。由于阶层和地域的差异,两大集团不仅在政治方面多有冲突,而且在经济利益方面也存在矛盾。相较谯沛士人经济生活中的奢侈和家富于财,汝颍士人之所以大多“清贫守约”“家无余财”,一方面是内在的儒家义利观对其门风的熏陶;另一方面应是外在社会环境对其生活风尚的影响,如曹操的尚俭政策以及两大集团间的政治冲突。由于汝颍士人在经济生活中加以克制,故使曹操政权中两大集团间的矛盾得以缓和,内部趋于稳定,一定程度上促进了曹操霸业的建立。There are two political groups in Cao Cao regime,one is Ru-Ying scholars group and the other is Qiao-Pei scholars group.Due to the differences in class and region,there are many conflicts not only in politics but also in economic interests between the two groups.Compared with the extravagance and wealth of Qiao-Pei scholars in their economic life,most of Ru-Ying scholars were of“poverty and frugality”and“having no surplus wealth at home”.On the one hand,their family style was influenced by the inherent Confucian concept of justice and benefit;On the other hand,it should be the influence of the external social environment on their lifestyle,such as Cao Cao’s policy of advocating thrift and the political conflict between the two groups.Due to the restraint of Ru-Ying scholars in their economic life,the contradiction between the two groups in Cao Cao regime was eased,and the internal unity was achieved,which promoted the establishment of Cao Cao’s hegemony to a certain extent.

关 键 词：曹操政权 汝颍士人 谯沛士人 经济生活 

分 类 号：K234[历史地理—历史学]