检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市虹口区人民法院 [2]上海金融法院
出 处:《武大国际法评论》2023年第3期85-102,共18页Wuhan University International Law Review
摘 要:基于反制和救济的功能定位,我国反外国制裁司法救济机制应当遵循中央事权原则、威慑原则、比例原则。反外国制裁的司法救济机制是涉外交事务的特别诉讼,有别于普通涉外民商事诉讼,应当建立特定的诉讼规则。在具体制度设计层面,应当完善集中管辖、审查层报、期间和送达、飞跃上诉等特殊审理程序,注意协调处理外国法院判决、国际商事仲裁裁决的承认与执行,并明确歧视性限制措施、制裁条款效力、损失赔偿责任等核心实体性问题的认定。Based on the dual functions of offsetting and remedying,China's judicial procedure of sanctions-related cases should follow the principles of central authority,deterrence,and proportionality.The judicial remedy procedure of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Case is a special litigation involving foreign affairs,which is different from ordinary foreign-related civil and commercial litigation,and specific procedural rules should be established.As to the detailed rules of adjudicating sanction-related cases,namely,centralized jurisdiction,internal reports and review,period and service,and leapfrog appeals should be customized to the current trial practices,especially in accordance with the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and international arbitral awards.Substantive issues,in the meanwhile,such as determining discriminatory restrictive measures,the effectiveness of sanctions clauses,and liability for losses,should also be clarified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170