检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴猛[1] Wu Meng
机构地区:[1]复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心暨哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《马克思主义理论学科研究》2023年第6期25-35,共11页Studies on Marxist Theory
摘 要:如果只是在《资本论》的叙述过程中理解“货币转化为资本”问题,会发现这里存在三个关键性“空白”:为什么马克思关于这一问题的叙述起点是G—W—G?为什么看似形式化的G—W—G内含“必然成立”的要求?为什么作为预付货币的G一定要以商品W为中介再回到自身?只有在《资本论》与《政治经济学批判(1857—1858年手稿)》的对读中,才能找到《资本论》中这三个关键性“空白”的答案,从而实现对于《资本论》这一部分文本的自洽解读。这种解读将表明,《资本论》中的从“货币”到“资本”的概念过渡,既不是某种线性历史发展的结果,也不是黑格尔式辩证法的展开,而是马克思运用形式分析方法获得的理论成果。If limited in Marx's Capital itself when we try to understand the question of the transformation from money to capital,we have to face three"blanks"that Marx didn't explain:Why is G-W-G set as the start point of the analysis of this question?Why does the seemly formal expression G-W-G contain the demand of"necessity"?Why must G as the prepaid money go back to itself with W(commodity)as its mediation?In this article,we will demonstrate that only through re-reading Marx's Grundrisse and viewing this text and Capital as a whole,which altogether exhibit Marx's method of"form-analyzing',can we fill the blanks and find that Marx's text about this question is self-consistent,and that the conceptual transformation from money to capital isn't the result of the development of a linear history,nor the development of Hegelian dialectics,but the theoretical result of Marx's applying his unique method of form-analyzing in his critique of political economy.
关 键 词:资本论 货币 资本 政治经济学批判(1857-1858年手稿)
分 类 号:A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90