媒体话语合法化建构的历史语篇分析——中美主流媒体贸易摩擦报道的对比研究  

A Study of Legitimizing Media Discourse from the Perspective of Discourse-Historical Approach:A Comparative Study of Trade Friction Reporting in Sino-American Mainstream Media

作　　者：胡元江[1] 李艳 HU Yuanjiang;LI Yan

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学外国语学院,江苏南京211816 [2]南京市第一中学江北新区分校,江苏南京211899

出　　处：《外国语文》2023年第4期92-101,共10页Foreign Languages and Literature

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“语料库驱动的中美主流媒体贸易摩擦话语合法化策略对比研究”(2020SJZDA011);江苏新文科研究与改革实践省级重点培育项目“创业型大学高素质涉外人才培养创新与实践”(苏教办高函[2021]13号)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本研究运用历史语篇分析法,基于语料库探讨中美主流媒体贸易摩擦话语合法化建构的异同,研究发现:在主题方面,双方均对基本信息及其影响作出介绍,但侧重点不同,美国强调由于强制技术转让,而对中国实施贸易制裁,侧重对本国企业造成的影响;中国则强调因美方强征关税,而采取反制措施,侧重对中美和全球经济造成的负面影响,并表明自身立场与对策。就实现方式而言,双方述谓策略均使用负面评价性语言,辩论策略均使用危险和威胁辩题,而中国还使用责任辩题;视角化策略均引用高级官员、经济专家话语,但中国直接引语比例更高,美国则间接引语比例更高,中国被引用者的身份清晰,美国还引用了匿名人士话语。这些异同体现双方不同的政治立场和意识形态。The study will analyze similarities and differences in the legitimation of trade friction discourse in Sino-American mainstream media using Discourse-Historical Approach based on corpora comparison.Results have indicated that in terms of theme,both sides introduce basic information and their impacts,with different emphases.U.S.stresses the reason for trade sanctions is China's compulsory technology transfer policy and focuses on the impacts on domestic enterprises.China stresses that China takes countermeasures as a result of the imposed tariffs,focusing on the negative impacts on both sides and global economy,and specifies China's stance and countermeasures.In terms of realization of legitimation,both sides use negative evaluative description as predication strategies;as for argumentation strategy,both sides employ topoi of danger and threat,while China also uses topoi of responsibility;in terms of perspectivization strategy,both sides cite words of senior officials and economic experts,but the proportion of Chinese direct quotation is much higher than that of U.S.while the proportion of American indirect quotation is higher;the identity of Chinese quotation is clear while U.S.quotes words of anonymous persons.These similarities and differences reflect the different political stances and ideologies of the two sides.

关 键 词：历史语篇分析法 合法化 媒体话语 贸易摩擦 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]