STORZ 26003BA胸腔镜微创手术与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的临床效果分析  

Clinical Effect Analysis of Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Thoracotomy for Esophageal Cancer

作　　者：邵长艳 SHAO Chang-yan(Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital,Tianjin 300140)

机构地区：[1]天津市第四中心医院,天津300140

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2023年第13期120-122,共3页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:对比分析胸腔镜微创手术与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的临床效果。方法:将2019年8月~2022年8月在医院接受食管癌手术治疗的患者64例作为研究对象,根据其手术治疗方式的不同将其分为接受STORZ 26003BA胸腔镜微创手术治疗的观察组(n=32)与接受传统开胸手术治疗的对照组(n=32)。结果:观察组患者治疗效果、手术时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、术中出血量、胸液引流时间、胸液引流量、住院时间以及并发症发生率均显著差别于对照组患者,P<0.05。两组患者术后随访情况并无显著统计学差异,P>0.05。结论:采用胸腔镜微创手术治疗食管癌,患者相关手术指标及术后恢复指标均获得了较为理想的治疗效果,减少了并发症出现,效果显著优于传统开胸手术。Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical results of thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery and traditional thoracotomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma(EC).Methods:A total of 64 patients who received EC surgery in hospital from August 2019 to August 2022 were selected as experimental subjects and divided into a thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery group(n=32)treated with STORZ 26003BA and a traditional thoracotomy control group(n=32)according to their surgical treatment methods.Results:The therapeutic effect,operation time,gastrointestinal function recovery time,intraoperative blood loss,thoracic drainage time,thoracic drainage volume,hospital stay and complication rate in the study group were significantly different from those in the reference group,P<0.05.There was no significant difference in postoperative follow-up between the two groups,P>0.05.Conclusion:Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery is an ideal surgical method for EC patients,which can effectively improve the relevant surgery and recovery indexes of patients,obtain relatively ideal therapeutic effect and reduce complications,and the effect is significantly better than that of traditional thoracotomy.

关 键 词：胸腔镜微创手术 传统开胸手术 食管癌 术中出血量 住院时间 

分 类 号：TH778[机械工程—仪器科学与技术]