行政诉讼调解保密原则之冷思考  

Cold Thinking on the Confidentiality Principle of Administrative Litigation Mediation

作　　者：高培培 GAO Peipei(Law School,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046,China)

机构地区：[1]华北水利水电大学法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期76-81,共6页Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2022CZZ020);华北水利水电大学高层次人才科研启动项目(2020110010)。

摘　　要：2018年2月8日施行的《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉的解释》(以下简称《行诉解释》)规定,行政诉讼调解应遵循保密原则。但在司法实践中,行政诉讼调解适用保密原则存在诸多弊端,不利于相关利益的保护,不利于发挥调解制度的预测、指引和监督功能等。我国的行政诉讼调解兼具实体法和行政诉讼法双重性质,应秉承行政法的程序正当原则和行政诉讼的公开原则,不能跟风采取保密原则,行政诉讼调解须公开进行。The Judicial Interpretation of the Administrative Procedure Law issued on February 8,2018 stipulates that the mediation of administrative litigation should follow the principle of confidentiality.But in judicial practice,there are many disadvantages in the application of confidentiality principle in administrative litigation mediation,which is not conducive to the protection of relevant interests,and is not conducive to the prediction,guidance and supervision of mediation system.The mediation of administrative litigation in China has the dual nature of substantive law and administrative procedure law,so it should adhere to the principle of due process of administrative law and the principle of openness of administrative litigation,and cannot follow the trend of adopting the principle of confidentiality,and the mediation of administrative litigation must be carried out in public.

关 键 词：行政诉讼调解 保密原则 调解性质 公开 

分 类 号：X921[环境科学与工程—安全科学]