行政公益诉讼诉前检察建议的优化路径  

The Optimization Path of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Pre-litigation Prosecution Proposal

作　　者：刘艳珍[1] 刘海娇 LIU Yanzhen;LIU Haijiao(College of Law,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046,China)

机构地区：[1]华北水利水电大学法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期90-97,共8页Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部政策法规司青少年法治教育委托课题(JYBZFSXT2020005)。

摘　　要：行政公益诉讼诉前程序作为一个制度创新点,对案件分流、节约司法资源起到了显著的作用。然而,检察机关过于强势、检察建议质量不高等问题也相继暴露出来,这些问题大多指向行政机关对诉前检察建议缺少申辩权这一程序漏洞。通过分析统计数据和典型案例,从实践层面为增加申辩权的必要性提供事实依据,又从诉前程序的独立性、检察机关的谦抑性等方面论证增加申辩权的理论基础,初步探索增加申辩权的具体路径,为诉前申辩权的立法提供建议。As a point of institutional innovation,the pre-litigation procedure of administrative public interest litigation has played a significant role in the diversion of cases and saving judicial resources.However,at the same time,the problems of overly strong procuratorial organs and poor quality of procuratorial recommendations have been exposed one after another.Most of these problems point to the lack of procedural loopholes in the administrative organ's right to defend against pre-litigation prosecutorial proposals,and the research on this issue is still in a gap in the theoretical field.Therefore,by analyzing statistical data and typical cases,this paper provides the factual basis for the necessity of increasing the right to plead from the practical level,and the theoretical basis for increasing the right to plead from the independence of pre-litigation procedures and the modesty of procuratorial organs.Finally,the specific path of increasing the right of defense is explored.

关 键 词：行政公益诉讼 诉前程序 检察建议 行政机关 申辩权 

分 类 号：D926.34[政治法律—法学]