检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦俨芸 WEI Yanyun(School of Public Administration,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China)
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《东莞理工学院学报》2023年第4期107-113,共7页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology
摘 要:传统“避风港”体系下网络平台的版权责任认定规则难以抵挡算法技术的系统性冲击,确有必要构建以事前治理为导向的版权过滤责任体系。利益平衡的坚守、经济效益的追求、制度建设的推动、过滤技术的发展也同时增强了版权过滤机制的可行性。应以比例原则找寻版权保护与言论自由的平衡点;秉持审慎适用的态度构建“版权过滤协议”自治规则,通过二元审查模式界定过滤范围,在类型化标准下采用“相对比例”设置过滤标准,同时健全反通知机制对错误过滤的权利施加救济。持续提高网络服务提供者的版权注意义务,对算法技术发起的挑战作出理性回应。The copyright liability determination rules of online platforms under the traditional“safe harbor”system cannot withstand the systematic impact of algorithm technology,and it is indeed necessary to build a copyright filtering liability system oriented by prior review.The adherence to the balance of interests,the pursuit of economic benefits,the promotion of system construction,and the development of filtering technology have also enhanced the feasibility of the copyright filtering mechanism.The principle of proportionality should be used to find the balance between copyright protection and freedom of speech;the autonomous rules of the“copyright filtering agreement”should be established with a prudent and applicable attitude,the filtering scope should be defined through the dual review mode,and the filtering standard should be set using“relative proportion”under the type standard,while sound counter-notification mechanisms impose remedies for false filtering rights.It is required to continuously promote the copyright responsibilities of network service providers to a higher duty of care,and to rationally respond to the challenges initiated by algorithm technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44