EC模式和GFS模式对黄渤海10m风速预报性能对比分析  

Comparative analysis on 10 m wind forecasts in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea from the ECMWF and GFS models

作　　者：王彬 李文博 李锐 侯乔琨 孙雅文 刘桂艳 WANG Bin;LI Wenbo;LI Rui;HOU Qiaokun;SUN Yawen;LIU Guiyan(North China Sea Marine Forecast and Hazard Mitigation Center of the Ministry of Natural Resources,Qingdao 266100,China;Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Environment and Disaster Prevention and Mitigation,Qingdao 266100,China)

机构地区：[1]自然资源部北海预报减灾中心,山东青岛266100 [2]山东省海洋生态环境与防灾减灾重点实验室,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《海洋预报》2023年第4期64-71,共8页Marine Forecasts

基　　金：亚洲合作资金项目(102121222060030009005);国家重点研发计划(2019YFC1408404);山东省海洋生态环境与防灾减灾重点实验室2016年度开放基金(201604)。

摘　　要：采用黄渤海10个海上浮标和5个近岸海洋站的风速观测资料作为实况,对2021年欧洲中期天气预报中心(EC)和美国国家环境预报中心全球预报系统(GFS)的10m风速预报产品进行检验评估和对比分析。结果表明:EC模式的整体预报效果优于GFS模式,其中EC模式24~72 h的均方根误差比GFS模式减小了6.8%~8.0%,EC模式的预报偏差中位数为0.19~0.25 m/s,而GFS模式同类中位数为0.33~0.41m/s,两种预报产品风速的预报结果整体略偏大,但EC模式的偏离程度更小。随着预报时效的增长,预报误差逐渐增大。在不同风速条件下,EC模式预报对5级及以下风的预报效果优于GFS模式预报,但后者对6级及以上风的预报效果更好。空间方面,两种模式对小长山站的预报效果最差,对黄海中部MF03007站的预报效果最好,GFS模式在渤海的预报效果优于EC模式,其他海区则EC模式的预报效果更好;在时间方面,EC模式风速产品在4—8月的预报效果优于GFS模式,其他月份则GFS模式的预报效果更好。在强天气过程方面,随着预报时效的增长,GFS模式的气旋预报出现误差急剧增大的现象。GFS模式对冷空气以及冷空气和气旋配合过程的预报效果好于EC模式,EC模式对渤海气旋的预报效果好于GFS模式,而对江淮气旋预报来说,不同过程下两种模式各有优劣。Using wind speed observation data collected by 10 buoys and 5 off-shore stations in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea,this study evaluates two products of 10m wind speed forecasts in 2021 with daily forecasting onset at 20 o'clock,one from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts(EC)and the other from Global Forecasting System(GFS).The results show that overall forecasting performance of the EC is better than the GFS.Root mean squared error of 24~72 h wind speed forecasts of the EC is reduced by 6.8%~8%compared to the GFS.Median bias of the EC forecasts for 24~72 h ranges between 0.19 m/s and 0.25 m/s,while that of the GFS ranges between 0.33 m/s and 0.41 m/s.The wind speed forecasts of the two products are slightly larger than the observation,in which the EC bias is relatively smaller.Specifically,the forecast error increases gradually along with the prolong of the forecast leading time.The EC forecast is better than the GFS forecast at Beaufort force 5 and below,while at Beaufort force 6 and above the latter is better.The two products perform worst at Xiaochangshan station,while best at MF03007 station in the central Yellow Sea.The GFS forecast is better than the EC in the Bohai Sea,while the EC performs better in other seas.The EC forecast is better than the GFS during April—August,while the GFS performs better in other months.The prediction error of cyclones of the GFS increases sharply along with the increase of forecast leading time.The GFS forecast is better than the EC on cold air,as well as its encountering process to cyclones,while the EC performs better on cyclones in the Bohai Sea.The two products have their own pros and cons on cyclones in Jianghuai area.

关 键 词：10m风速 欧洲中期天气预报中心 全球预报系统 均方根误差 

分 类 号：P732.1[天文地球—海洋科学]