检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张柔荑 陈珂欣 赵晨 李佳璐 Zhang Routi;Chen Kexin;Zhao Chen;Li Jialu(Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044
出 处:《襄阳职业技术学院学报》2023年第4期129-134,共6页Journal of Xiangyang Polytechnic
摘 要:近年来,电子商务平台商标恶意投诉呈现逐渐增加的趋势,现行法学研究以及司法实践对相关主体民事责任承担问题规定比较模糊,甚至存在空白之处。完善现有民事责任分配机制应重点从三方面着手:明确享有赔偿损失请求权的主体、明确损害赔偿的范围以及明确三方主体承担的责任。具体而言:承认遭受损失的电商平台也享有赔偿损失请求权并将实际损失和预期损失同时纳入损害赔偿的范围内,基于电商平台的性质分类确定主体之间承担的不同责任形态。In recent years,malicious trademark complaints on e-commerce platforms have shown a gradually increasing trend,and the current legal research and judicial practice have vague provisions on the civil liability of relevant subjects,and even there are gaps.The improvement of the existing civil liability distribution mechanism should focus on three aspects:to clarify the subject enjoying the right to claim compensation for loss,to clarify the scope of damage compensation and to clarify the responsibility of the three parties.Specifically,the e-commerce platform that acknowledges the loss also has the right to claim compensation for the loss and includes the actual loss and expected loss into the scope of damage compensation at the same time,and determines the different forms of liability between the subjects based on the nature and classification of the e-commerce platform.Only in this way can we provide a set of recommended standards of legal fairness and efficiency for judicial practice to deal with the contradiction of responsibility allocation in such cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49