中国非专利实施企业与专利实施企业诉讼策略对比研究:理论分析与经验证据  

The Comparison of Litigation Strategies between NPEs and PEs in China:A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence

作　　者：荆然[1] 尹志锋[2] 张锦[1] JING Ran;YIN Zhifeng;ZHANGJin(University of International Business and Economics;Central University of Finance and Economics)

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院,100029 [2]中央财经大学经济学院,100081

出　　处：《经济学（季刊）》2023年第4期1283-1301,共19页China Economic Quarterly

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(72273028,71973024,72274231);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金;中央财经大学重大研究支持计划(2022);对外经济贸易大学数字贸易科研实验室培育项目的资助。

摘　　要：非专利实施企业(NPE)是指拥有专利但不以专利实施为目的,主要通过发起专利诉讼或许可专利而获益的主体。相较于专利实施企业(PE),NPE发起诉讼更具策略性。本研究在理论上对比了NPE与PE在诉讼策略上的差异,并基于我国专利侵权诉讼结案数据对所提出的定理进行了实证检验。在考虑了和解对诉讼数据的影响后,本文发现NPE发起的诉讼少于PE,且更侧重使用低价值专利发起诉讼。Non-practicing Entities(NPEs)refer to firms that do not produce goods and services based on their patents but instead collect revenues from license fees or damage payments.Compared with practi-cing entities(PE),they litigate strategically.We analyze the litigation strategies of PEs and NPEs in theo-retical models and tests the predictions with China's first-instance patent infringement case dataset.After taking into account the impacts of settlement on the litigation dataset,we find that NPEs litigate fewer ca-ses than PEs,and they are more willing to target low-value patents.

关 键 词：非专利实施企业 专利实施企业 专利侵权诉讼 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]