检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭素然[1] 刘怡辰 吕少博 付海玲 GUO Su-ran;LIU Yi-chen;LÜShao-bo;FU Hai-ling(Psychological Research Service Center,University of International Relations,Beijing 100091,China;School of Psychology and Mental Health,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063000,China;Student Affairs Office,Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang 050067,China)
机构地区:[1]国际关系学院心理研究服务中心,北京100091 [2]华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院,唐山063000 [3]河北经贸大学学生工作部,石家庄050067
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2023年第4期871-874,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“青少年霸凌旁观者行为的影响机制”(17YJC190005)资助。
摘 要:目的:在中国大学生群体中对网络去抑制量表进行修订。方法:采用中文版网络去抑制量表对来自六所高校的1249名大学生进行调查,以反应性网络攻击行为量表、流调中心用抑郁量表和旁观保护行为量表作为外部效标。间隔四周后选取118名大学生进行重测。结果:(1)量表的各个项目具有良好的区分度,项目与总分相关在0.42~0.70间;(2)通过探索性因素分析得到良性网络去抑制和恶性网络去抑制两个维度,累积方差贡献率为54.47%;(3)验证性因素分析表明两因素模型拟合良好(χ^(2)/df=3.52,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.05,NFI=0.95,RFI=0.94,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97);(4)反应性网络攻击、抑郁与中文版网络去抑制量表及其两维度得分均呈正相关(r=0.23~0.54,P<0.001),旁观保护行为与恶性去抑制呈负相关(r=-0.15,P<0.01),与良性去抑制呈正相关(r=0.16,P<0.01);(5)量表总体及两个分量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.73~0.88间,McDonald’sω系数在0.74~0.89间;间隔四周后的重测信度分别为0.79、0.78和0.80(P<0.001)。结论:中文版网络去抑制量表具有较高的信、效度,可以用于测评中国大学生的网络去抑制水平。Objective:To test reliability and validity of online disinhibition scale in Chinese university students.Meth⁃ods:Altogether 1249 undergraduate students from six universities were recruited,and the reactive cyber aggression scale,self-report depression scale and protective bystander behavior scale were used as external calibration criterion.And 118 university students were retested after four weeks.Results:①The discrimination of items was satisfied,with item-total score correlations ranging from 0.42 to 0.70;②The EFA revealed that the final Chinese version of the Online Disinhibition Scale included two dimensions,benign disinhibition and toxic disinhibition,which explained a total variance of 54.47%;③The CFA found that the two-factor model fitted well(χ^(2)/df=3.52,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.05,NFI=0.95,RFI=0.94,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97);④Reactive cyber aggressive behavior and depression were all positively correlated with the scale(r=0.23-0.54,P<0.001),bystander protective behavior was negatively correlated with toxic disinhibition positively correlated(r=-0.15,P<0.01),and positively correlated with benign de-inhibition(r=0.16,P<0.01);⑤Cronbach’sαcoefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.88,and McDonald’sωcoefficients ranged from 0.74 to 0.89;test-retest reliability after a four-week interval were 0.79,0.78 and 0.80,respectively(P<0.001).Conclusion:The Chinese version of online disinhibition scale showed satisfied reliability and validity,and can be used to measure online disinhibition for Chinese university students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.54.249