危重症专职护理模式对呼吸衰竭患者肺脏功能、血气分析指标、生命质量以及患者对护理满意度的影响  

Impacts of Full-Time Critical Illness Nursing on the Lung Function,Blood Gas Analysis Indicators,Life Quality and Clinical Satisfaction of Respiratory Failure Patients

作　　者：徐小英[1] XU Xiaoying(Department of Respiratory Medicine,Henan Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou Henan 450002,China)

机构地区：[1]河南省胸科医院呼吸内科,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《临床研究》2023年第9期187-190,共4页Clinical Research

摘　　要：目的探讨危重症专职护理模式对呼吸衰竭患者肺脏功能、血气分析指标、生命质量以及患者对护理满意度的影响。方法对河南省胸科医院2020年9月至2021年9月收治的呼吸衰竭患者展开研究,以随机数表法为分组依据,将符合纳入标准的60例患者分为研究组(n=30,危重症专职护理模式)和对照组(n=30,常规护理),比较两组患者护理前后肺脏功能、血气分析指标、生命质量,并统计两组患者对护理满意度的差异。结果两组护理前肺脏功能水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组VT水平均高于对照组,f、Ti/Te低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组护理前血气分析指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后两组发生巨大差异,其中研究组PaO_(2)、SaO_(2)水平均高于对照组,PaCO_(2)水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究干预前SGRQ评分与对照组比较无明显差异,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组干预后SGRQ评分均低于本组干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究干预后SGRQ评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组护理满意度比较差异显著,研究组明显更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论危重症专职护理模式在呼吸衰竭患者中的应用效果确切,能改善患者肺脏功能和血气分析指标,有利于病情恢复,提高生活质量和护理满意度,值得在临床应用。Objective To discuss the impacts of full-time critical illness nursing on the lung function,blood gas analysis indicators,life quality and clinical satisfaction of respiratory failure patients.Methods A study was conducted on patients with respiratory failure admitted to Henan Chest Hospital from September 2020 to September 2021.According to the random number table method,60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into the study group(n=30,critical care full-time nursing mode)and the control group(n=30,routine nursing).The lung function,blood gas analysis index and quality of life were compared between the two groups before and after nursing,and the differences in nursing satisfaction between the two groups were counted.Results There was no statistically significant difference in lung function between the two groups before nursing(P>0.05).After nursing,the VT level of the study group was higher than that of the control group,and f and Ti/Te were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in blood gas analysis indexes between the two groups before nursing(P>0.05),but there was a huge difference between the two groups after nursing.The levels of PaO_(2)and SaO_(2)in the study group were higher than those in the control group,and the level of PaCO_(2)was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in SGRQ score between the two groups before intervention(P>0.05).The SGRQ scores of the two groups after intervention were lower than those before intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The SGRQ scores of the study group after intervention were lower than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was a significant difference in nursing satisfaction between the two groups,and the study group was significantly higher than the control group,and th

关 键 词：危重症专职护理模式 呼吸衰竭 肺脏功能 血气分析指标 生命质量 满意度 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]