检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:娄必县 李霜明 Lou Bixian;Li Shuangming
机构地区:[1]重庆理工大学重庆知识产权学院 [2]重庆科技创新知识产权研究中心 [3]重庆万慧达知识产权服务有限责任公司
出 处:《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第4期21-31,共11页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划培育项目“高校知识产权保护的功能转型与制度构建”(2020PY78);重庆市教委社科规划项目“成渝地区双城经济圈科技创新立法协同机制研究”(22SKGH308)。
摘 要:由于外观设计专利审查方式形式化以及我国现行法律对外观设计专利诉权滥用案件的认定标准和裁判标准没有具体规定,司法实践也没有明确的裁判标准,灯具设计领域近年频繁出现假借合法诉讼手段牟取非法利益的现象。通过诉讼滥用外观设计专利权,不仅会损害他人的合法利益、破坏竞争秩序,而且还会浪费司法资源。规制灯具外观设计专利权的滥用是节约司法资源、维护市场竞争秩序、维护社会诚信的必然要求。在对此类案件进行实证分析的基础上,提议从增强个体权利意识、发挥行业协会作用、完善立法、加强司法等多个层面构建我国规制外观设计专利诉权滥用的制度。Due to the formalization of the examination method of the design patent,the lack of specific provisions on the identification and judgment standards of the cases of abuse of litigation right to design patent in current Chinese laws,and the lack of clear judgment standards in judicial practice,there are frequent cases in the field of lamp design where legal litigation means are falsely used to seek illegal interests.The abuse of design patent right by means of litigation not only damages the legitimate interests of others,destroys the order of competition,but also seriously wastes judicial resources.It is necessary to regulate the abuse of lamp design patent right to save judicial resources,protect market competition order and maintain social integrity.Based on of the empirical analysis of such cases,the system of regulating the abuse of litigation right to design patent in China is constructed from the aspects of strengthening individual rights awareness,giving play to the role of industry associations,improving legislation and strengthening judicature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49