检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Chenhui Jiang Dejun Zhu Haobo Li Xiaoqun Liu Danxun Li
机构地区:[1]State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084,China [2]Hunan Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Changsha,410007,China
出 处:《International Journal of Sediment Research》2023年第5期711-723,共13页国际泥沙研究(英文版)
基 金:support from the National Key R&D Program of China(Grant No.2022YFC3201803);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.52179069);the Water Conservancy and Technology Program of Hunan Province,China(Grant Nos.XSKJ2019081-03,XSKJ2021000-08).
摘 要:Numerical modeling is a well-recognized method for studying the hydrodynamic processes in river networks.Multi-source measurements also offer abundant information on the patterns and mechanisms within the processes.Therefore,improving hydrodynamic modeling of river networks through the use of data assimilation techniques has become a hot research topic in recent years.The particle filter(PF)is a commonly used data assimilation method and has been proven to be applicable to various nonlinear and non-Gaussian models.In the current study,an improved numerical hydrodynamic model for large-scale river networks is established by incorporating the advanced PF algorithm.Furthermore,the PF method based on the Gaussian likelihood function(GLF)and the method based on the Cauchy likelihood function(CLF)are compared for a complex river network scenario.The feasibility of the PF-based methods was evaluated through application to the Yangtze-Dongting River-lake Network(YDRN)by assimilating water stage data collected at six hydrometric stations during the entire hydrodynamic process in 2003.Additionally,the parameters used in the likelihood function,which affect the assimilation performance,also were explored in the current study.The study results found that the accuracy of the model-derived water stage data was improved when the PF-based methods are utilized,with improvement not only at the data assimilation(calibration)sites but also at three hydrometric stations not used in the data assimilation(i.e.,verification sites).The highest average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency result for the six assimilation sites were 0.98 while the lowest summed root-mean-square-error result was 1.801 m.The comparison results also indicated that the CLF-based PF outperformed the GLF-based PF when high-accuracy observed data are available.Specifically,the CLF can effectively resolve the filtering failure problem and the dispersion problem of PFs,and further improve the accuracy of the filtering results for a river network scenario.In summary,the CLF-bas
关 键 词:River networks Hydrodynamic process Particle filter Likelihood function
分 类 号:TV131.2[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236