汉唐“白虹贯日”解释范式之转变及其文化记忆  

The Transformation of the Interpretation Paradigm of "Baihong Guanri" in Han and Tang Dynasties and Its Cultural Memory

作　　者：张月 Zhang Yue(University of Macao,China)

机构地区：[1]澳门大学中国语言文学系,中国 [2]澳门大学人文社科高等研究院,中国澳门氹仔999078

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第5期99-108,共10页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：澳门大学多年度研究资助项目(MYRG2022-00058-FAH)。

摘　　要：“白虹贯日”的解读几经范式演变。先民记录白虹贯日为自然天象,到战国时期视其为政治禁忌,汉代从伦理角度进行比附、影射,六朝时期因社会动荡而将其比附为政治兵象,再到唐朝对其进行诗性阐释。从先秦到唐,“白虹贯日”解读范式的转变体现了不同历史时期的文化记忆与文学特征,其间它也逐渐与广泛流传的荆轲刺秦王故事相联系,呈现出不同的文化解读。在唐代诗人笔下,荆轲刺秦王、白虹贯日在精诚、复仇和壮志豪情等方面成为盛唐气象、“少年精神”的象征,体现了蓬勃时代的青春力量。然而,安史之乱后,皇权政治式微,白虹贯日再度成为禁忌。There were several paradigm shifts in the reading of "Baihong Guanri"(white rainbow penetrating the sun 白虹贯日).It was interpreted as a natural celestial phenomenon by our ancestors,a political taboo in the Warring State period,an ethical innuendo in the Han dynasty,a political chaos and foreshadow of war during the Six dynasties period,and a poetic elucidation in the Tang dynasty.The shifts reflected the cultural memory and literary characteristics of each historical period,which generated different cultural interpretations,gradually correlated with the widespread story of Jing Ke's attempt of assassinating the King of Qin.In Tang poetry,Jing Ke's attempted assassination and "Baihong Guanri" became the main symbols of "the youthful spirit" of High Tang culture in the sincerity of vengeance and lofty sentiments and aspirations.However,the Tang dynasty went downhill after the An Lushan-Shi Siming rebellion,and "Baihong Guanri" became taboo once again.

关 键 词：白虹贯日 荆轲刺秦王 少年精神 伦理比附 诗性解读 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学]