机构地区:[1]电子科技大学医学院附属妇女儿童医院、成都市妇女儿童中心医院保健部,成都610091
出 处:《中华传染病杂志》2023年第7期440-446,共7页Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases
基 金:中国疾病预防控制中心妇幼保健中心2022年度母婴营养与健康研究项目(2022FYH005);2021年成都市医学科研课题(2021354)。
摘 要:目的纵向对比人类免疫缺陷病毒暴露未感染(HEU)组与健康对照组儿童0~18月龄的生长发育差异,以评估HEU儿童早期体格生长发育的情况。方法采用回顾性队列研究设计,收集2013年1月至2019年12月成都市出生并上报国家预防艾滋病、梅毒和乙肝母婴传播管理信息系统的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染母亲的孕产期信息,以及其所生HEU儿童0、1、3、6、9、12、18月龄的随访信息,并按母亲分娩年龄、分娩孕周和出生性别1∶1匹配人类免疫缺陷病毒未暴露未感染(HUU)儿童作为健康对照组,HEU组与HUU组各纳入385名儿童。采用配对样本t检验、多水平模型比较两组儿童0~18月龄体格生长发育的差异。结果HEU组儿童0、3、6月龄的年龄别体重Z评分(WAZ)分别为-0.72±1.03、-0.09±1.18、0.05±1.09,分别低于HUU组的-0.21±1.04、0.42±1.19、0.41±1.16,差异均有统计学意义(t=8.41、7.47、5.18,均P<0.001);HEU组儿童3、6、12、18月龄的年龄别身长Z评分(LAZ)分别为-0.23±1.36、-0.01±1.48、-0.18±1.20、-0.32±1.13,分别低于HUU组的0.24±1.26、0.30±1.26、0.07±1.11、0.04±1.05,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.14、4.04、2.72、4.30,均P<0.01);HEU组儿童0、3、6月龄的身长别体重Z评分(WLZ)分别为-1.05±1.18、0.23±1.03、0.22±0.95,分别低于HUU组的-0.20±0.98、0.44±1.03、0.45±1.00,差异均有统计学意义(t=10.90、2.95、2.96,均P<0.01)。矫正可能的混杂因素后,HEU儿童0、3、6月龄WAZ,3、6、12、18月龄LAZ,以及0、3、6月龄WLZ仍分别低于HUU儿童。结论成都市HEU和HUU儿童的体格生长发育差异主要发生在婴儿早期6月龄内,但身长差异持续至18月龄。产前暴露于HIV感染会影响胎儿和出生后的体格生长发育。Objective To assess the early physical growth and development of human immunodeficiency virus-exposed uninfected(HEU)children by longitudinally comparing the differences of growth and development between HEU group and the healthy human immunodeficiency virus-unexposed uninfected(HUU)control group of children aged 0 to 18 months.Methods A retrospective cohort study was designed.Maternal information of the human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)infected mothers and follow-up information at 0,1,3,6,9,12,and 18 months postpartum of their children(born between January 2013 and December 2019 in Chengdu City)were collected from the Information System of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Management.The HUU control group was matched with HEU group by maternal age,gestational age at birth,and infant gender at a ratio of 1∶1.There were 385 children each included in the HEU and HUU groups.Matched samples t-test and the multilevel models were used to compared the physical developmental differences between the two groups.Results Weight for age Z scores(WAZ)at 0,3,6 months of HEU group were-0.72±1.03,-0.09±1.18 and 0.05±1.09,respectively,which were all lower than WAZ of HUU group(-0.21±1.04,0.42±1.19 and 0.41±1.16,respectively),which were all significantly different(t=8.41,7.47 and 5.18,respectively,all P<0.001).Length for age Z scores(LAZ)at 3,6,12,18 months of HEU group were-0.23±1.36,-0.01±1.48,-0.18±1.20 and-0.32±1.13,respectively,which were all lower than LAZ of HUU group(0.24±1.26,0.30±1.26,0.07±1.11 and 0.04±1.05,respectively),which were all significantly different(t=6.14,4.04,2.72 and 4.30,respectively,all P<0.01).Weight for length Z scores(WLZ)at 0,3,6 months of HEU group were-1.05±1.18,0.23±1.03 and 0.22±0.95,respectively,which were all lower than WLZ of HUU group(-0.20±0.98,0.44±1.03 and 0.45±1.00,respectively),which were all significantly different(t=10.90,2.95 and 2.96,respectively,all P<0.01).After possible confounding factors were corrected,the WAZ of HEU c
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...