《管子》“桓公问”故事的文本来源问题再检视——由清华简《管仲》篇谈起  

Re-examination of Text Source of“Huan Gong Asked”in Guan Zi——Talking about Guan Zhong in Qinghua Bamboo Slips

作　　者：苗江磊 MIAO Jianglei(College of Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan,Shandong 250014)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2023年第3期47-54,共8页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目“《史记》战国游说故事研究”(21DZWJ05)。

摘　　要：近年《管子》研究多集中于此书的单篇创作、该书与稷下学派的渊源等问题,而《管子》文本的创作内涵可结合近出简帛进行更深层的探讨。清华简《管仲》基于齐桓公与管仲问对的形式架构全文,简文所体现出的着意编排、涵盖他派学说等因素正揭示出它是带有模拟附会性质的托名作品。通过对传世《管子》中“桓公问”故事的考察,也可证明假托齐桓公与管子之名的模拟附会之作有着颇为广泛的存在。“桓公问”故事带有演练谏君议政的特点,应与稷下学士“不治而议论”的需要紧密有关。这些深富托名虚构特征的故事产生于齐国招贤纳谏和稷下学士尊崇管仲声名的背景之下,它们已成为文学作品在不断迈向自觉的发展中十分可贵的有益尝试。In recent years,the research on Guan Zi has mostly focused on the single piece creation of the book and the relationship between the book and Jixia school.The creative connotation of the relevant texts of Guan Zi can be further explored from the unearthed documents.Based on the formal structure of the dialogue between Huan Gong and Guan Zhong,Guan Zhong,a simplified version of Qinghua bamboo slips is a Name-borrowing essay with the nature of imitation and affiliation,which is reflected by the characteristics of careful arrangement and covering other schools of thought.Through the investigation of the story of“Huan Gong asked”in Guan Zi,it can also be proved that there are quite a wide range of Name-borrowing essays in the name of Huan Gong and Guan Zi.This kind of story should be closely related to the situation in which the Jixia bachelors'“talked about politics without governance”and practiced remonstrating with the monarch.These Name-borrowing essays,which are rich in fictional characteristics,are produced by the trend of recruiting and accepting admonition in Qi and the respect of the Jixia bachelors for Guan Zhong's reputation.They have become very valuable attempts in continuous development of literary works towards self-consciousness.

关 键 词：清华简《管仲》 《管子》 “桓公问管子” 稷下学士 托名虚构 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]