网盘服务提供者的版权责任认定规则及其优化路径  

The Copyright Liability Determination Rules and Optimization Paths of Network Disk Service Providers

作　　者：崔玲玲 李扬[2] Cui Lingling;Li Yang

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广州510275 [2]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《学海》2023年第4期192-201,共10页Academia Bimestris

摘　　要：网盘服务提供者的版权责任认定,应以网络侵权责任的基本法理为分析依据,但网盘的技术特征又决定了法律适用具有一定的特殊性。以MD5值为要件的权利通知,难以构成通知中的“网络地址”。算法推荐技术的出现,导致司法裁判产生了从“通知-删除”到“通知-必要措施”的规则转变。“通知-必要措施”规则能否与网盘服务本身的特性相契合,归责逻辑是否合理,仍有探讨空间。网盘离线下载、秒传属于单纯的技术功能,与公开传播难以等同,网盘分享则需要结合具体的分享方式进行分析。据此,应当合理划定网盘服务提供者的注意义务边界,力争在保护权利人权利与鼓励技术创新之间找到平衡点。When we determine the copyright liability of network disk service providers,we should use the basic legal principles of network tort liability as the basis for analysis.However,the technical characteristics of the network disk determine the particularity of the application of the law.The“network address”in the notification of MD5 value is difficult to constitute the“network address”in the notification.Algorithm recommendation technology has led to judicial referees from the rules of“notification-deletion”to the rules of“notification-necessary measures”.Whether the“notice-necessary measures”rules can fit the technical characteristics of the network disk service and whether the logic of accountability is reasonable?These two issues are worth exploring.The online disk download service and second pass service are simple technical functions,which is different from public spread.Therefore,the responsibility of network disk sharing needs to be determined in conjunction with specific sharing methods.Based on this,the attention obligations of the network disk service provider should be reasonably defined,and strive to find a balance point between protecting the rights of rights and encouraging technological innovation.

关 键 词：网络服务提供者 网盘技术 MD5值 “通知-必要措施”规则 侵权责任 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]