传说与历史记忆:主体人群与边疆人群如何“与共”?——从“庄蹻王滇”和“打箭炉”说起  

Legends and Historical Memory:How Main Population Coexists with the Frontier People?:A Case Study of"Zhuang Qiao's Declaring Himself as King of Yunnan(Dian)"and the Toponym of"Tachienlu"

作　　者：石硕[1] SHI Shuo

机构地区：[1]教育部,成都610064

出　　处：《西北民族研究》2023年第3期5-13,共9页Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies

摘　　要：文章通过对两个案例的分析讨论,提出一个重要的文化现象:历史上当主体人群与边疆人群之间出现大规模交往交流时,二者必然需要“与共”,需要构建彼此的关联性。在此情形下,人们往往选择和利用传说来塑造共同历史记忆、共同符号。这些传说虽掺杂了许多与史实不符的主观成分,却真实反映了不同时代主体人群与边疆人群“与共”的愿望与需求,是一种重要的历史真实。这类传说尽管因包含较多主观建构成分而受到主流文化的忽视、冷落或排斥,但其重要的文化整合功能与作用不容小觑,它对于我们理解和认识历史上主体人群与边疆人群之间大规模交往交流之时如何“与共”,如何进行文化整合,具有重要的历史价值和社会意义。Through the analysis and discussion of two cases,this article proposes an important cultural phenomenon:when large-scale exchanges occurred between the main population and the frontier people in history,the two learned to coexist and build mutual relevance between each other.Under such circumstances,people often choose and use legends to shape common historical memory and symbols.Although these legends are mixed with many subjective elements that are inconsistent with historical facts,they truly reflect the wishes and needs of the main population and the frontier people to coexist with each other throughout different historical eras,there is no doubt that this phenomenon constitutes an important historical truth.Although such legends are neglected,desolated or rejected by mainstream culture due largely to their subjective construction elements,their important cultural integration functions and roles should not be underestimated.It has important historical value and social significance for us to understand how main population coexists with the frontier people during large-scale communication and blending between the two groups in history and how they realize cultural integration thereafter.

关 键 词：“与共” 传说 历史记忆 庄蹻王滇 打箭炉 铸牢中华民族共同体意识 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]