检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王启梁 戴溪瀛[2] WANG Qiliang;DAI Xiying
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学法学院,昆明650504 [2]云南大学法学院,昆明650504
出 处:《西北民族研究》2023年第3期74-82,共9页Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“法治建设的社会基础研究”(编号:20AFX001)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:第二次世界大战后,法律人类学文化相对论者一直在努力重新审视法律。梅丽主张以实用主义态度走出概念争论的泥淖,注重在日常生活中寻找法律多样形态的踪迹,将历史视角引入当代法律研究,以深化对规范体系之间的关系和层次的认识。其法律人类学思想与“各美其美、美美与共”的路径内在相通,可为我们重新审视文化差异和跨文化法律实践提供借鉴,也对我国法律人类学研究在思想、视角、方法、议题、研究内容和理论方向上有借鉴意义。Cultural relativists in legal anthropology had been trying to reflect on the laws after World War II.Sally E.Merry advocated a pragmatic approach to move law research beyond the confines of conceptual debates.She urged researchers to pay attention to the traces of legal pluralism in everyday life and to deepen their understanding of the relationship and level between legal systems by putting legal pluralism research into historical perspective.Her legal anthropology thought was intrinsically connected with the idea of'appreciating the culture and values of others as one's own",which suggests reflecting on cultural differences and cross-cultural legal practices.This approach could also help renew the academic thought,perspectives,methodologies,topics,research contents,and theoretical development of Chinese legal anthropology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49