检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马瑞聪 Ma Ruicong(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100091,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100091
出 处:《网络安全与数据治理》2023年第8期28-33,共6页CYBER SECURITY AND DATA GOVERNANCE
摘 要:在信息主体与信息处理者的利益衡平中,信息主体的删除权存在限制不足的问题。当删除权的行使与公众知情权、言论自由等公共利益发生冲突,或与信息处理者的利益损失显著失衡时,我国删除权的限制规则存在规范供给不足的问题。我国删除权的限制规则采双重限制模式,其中删除权的形成限制以比例原则为指引,删除权的行使限制以禁止权利滥用原则为指引。通过借鉴GDPR和BDSG中的删除权限制规则,运用解释和类推适用的方法对我国删除权的限制规则进行完善。In the balance of interests between information subjects and information processors,there are insufficient restrictions on the right of information subjects to delete.When the exercise of the right to delete conflicts with public interests such as the public′s right to know and freedom of speech,or is significantly out of balance with the loss of interests of information processors,China′s restriction rules for the right to delete have the problem of insufficient regulation and supply.China′s restriction rules on the right to delete adopt a dual restriction model,in which the formation and restriction of the right to delete is guided by the principle of proportionality,and the exercise of the right to delete is guided by the principle of prohibition of abuse of rights.By drawing on the rules on the restriction of the right to delete in the GDPR and BDSG,the methods of interpretation and analogy are used to improve the restriction rules of the right to delete in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.133.22