韩国“慰安妇”历史修正主义思潮辨析——以《反日种族主义》与《帝国的慰安妇》为例  

South Korea’s Historical Revisionism on“Comfort Women” Issue: A Focus on Anti-Japan Racism and The Comfort Women of the Empire

作　　者：周晓蕾 Zhou Xiaolei

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学亚洲学院,北京100081

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期28-35,141,共9页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA320)。

摘　　要：近年韩国社会有关“慰安妇”问题的历史修正主义思潮逐渐抬头,值得关注与警惕。两本代表性畅销著作《反日种族主义》《帝国的慰安妇》分别从保守与进步两条思想脉络出发,却殊途同归地与日本右翼对“慰安妇”问题的历史否认形成共鸣与合流。前书由保守政治力学所驱动,意识形态根植于二战后至今韩国未经根本动摇的“殖民—冷战”体制;后书则体现了后冷战时期韩国进步思想界基于女性主义、后现代主义等左翼批判理论漠视并排斥民族议题的趋势。两书共同反映出韩国“慰安妇”历史修正主义的核心思想特征为民族主义批判,其对集体记忆的挑战,体现了当代韩国重建国家民族认同的认识论之争,也与冷战后日本的历史修正主义思潮形成跨国连接与互动。In recent years,there has been an alarming increase in historical revisionism concerning the issue of“comfort women”in South Korea.Two best-selling books,Anti-Japan Racism and The Comfort Women of the Empire,with differing conservative and progressive ideologies,have unintentionally aligned with the Japanese right-wing’s denial of the“comfort women”issue.The former book is motivated by conservative political mechanics and deeply rooted in the long-standing“colonial-cold war”system that has prevailed in South Korea since the World War II.On the other hand,the latter book reflects the prevailing trend among progressive intellectuals in South Korea during the post-Cold War period,which blindly rejects and ignores nationalism issues based on critical theories such as feminism and postmodernism.As reflected in both books,the core feature of Korea’s historical revisionism on the“comfort women”issue is the criticism of nationalism.Its challenge to South Korea’s collective memory is essentially an epistemological struggle for rebuilding the national identity,and also forms a transnational connection and interaction with Japanese historical revisionism in the post-Cold War era.

关 键 词：“慰安妇”问题 历史修正主义 民族主义 《反日种族主义》 《帝国的慰安妇》 

分 类 号：K093.126[历史地理—历史学]