检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李沛峰 王潇 崔金玉 付文锋[4] LI Peifeng;WANG Xiao;CUI Jinyu;FU Wenfeng(Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning&Design,Beijing 100045,China;Beijing Tsinghua Tongheng Planning&Designing Institute,Beijing 100085,China;Beijing Capital Planning and Design Engineering Consulting Development Co.,Ltd,Beijing 100045,China;School of Energy and Power Engineering,North China Electric Power University,Baoding 071003,China)
机构地区:[1]北京市城市规划设计研究院市政所,北京100045 [2]北京清华同衡规划设计研究院有限公司,北京100085 [3]北京市首都规划设计工程咨询开发有限公司,北京100031 [4]华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院,河北保定071003
出 处:《热科学与技术》2023年第3期280-289,共10页Journal of Thermal Science and Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(52090064)。
摘 要:为科学表征供冷系统能源消耗状况,将供冷系统划分为6个子系统,从总能系统层次上给出了适合于各类供冷系统的广义化的能耗评价一般模型。在此基础上,结合单耗分析方法,提出了供冷系统能耗的定量计算方法。采用了热力学第一定律、热力学第二定律分析,对供冷过程的热力学本质、冷量[火用]、供冷能力等方面展开研究,系统阐述了供冷系统的理论节能极限及理论最低能耗,并立足总能系统对供冷过程的理论极限-可逆供冷作出了说明。在北京市设计标准下,供冷系统理论最低燃料单耗为0.82 kg/GJ,当前供冷系统能耗水平(25.27 kg/GJ)与之相比,节能潜力甚大。为验证所构建的供冷系统能耗评价一般化模型,结合北京市通州区供冷系统的实施方案,对分散电制冷、集中电制冷、分散热制冷、集中热制冷4个基本类型的供冷模式进行了实例计算分析,并与4种模式的[火用]分析计算结果进行了比较,结果显示:所提能耗模型与[火用]分析结果一致,电制冷燃料单耗低于热制冷,分散制冷燃料单耗低于集中制冷,集中热制冷能耗较高,应慎重发展。所提出的能耗分析评估模型为各种类型供冷系统的一般化对比评估提供了理论分析方法,同时可为城市供冷系统的规划设计提供参考。Affected by global warming and shortage of energy resources,cooling system is increasingly popular,and its energy consumption control is widely concerned.In order to represent the energy consumption of the cooling system scientifically,the cooling system was divided into six subsystems,and a generalized energy consumption evaluation model for different types of cooling systems was proposed from the aspect of total energy system.On this basis,combined with the theory of single consumption analysis,a quantitative calculation method of energy consumption of cooling system was proposed.In accordance with the first and the second laws of thermodynamics,thermodynamic essence,cooling exergy and cooling ability in the process of cooling were discussed.The energy saving theoretical minimum of cooling system is analyzed,and theoretical limit of cooling system and reversible cooling were expounded based on the general energy system.Under the current design standard of Beijing,the theoretical minimum fuel unit consumption of the cooling system was O.82 kg/GJ.Compared with the current energy consumption level of the cooling system(25.27 kg/GJ),it had great potential for energy saving.In order to verify the energy consumption evaluation model of cooling system,combined with Tongzhou refrigeration system scheme,four basic types of cooling systems including separate electric cooling,centralized electric refrigeration,separate thermal refrigeration and centralized thermal refrigeration were analyzed and compared with exergy analysis results.The results showed that the proposed model was consistent with the exergy analysis,energy consumption of electric refrigeration fuel was lower than that of thermal cooling,the separate refrigeration fuel consumption was lower than the centralized refrigeration,and the centralized thermal refrigeration energy consumption was higher,which should be careful to develop.The proposed energy consumption evaluation model could provide theoretical support for the unified evaluation of different types o
分 类 号:TK11[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.224.72