科技期刊审稿专家激励策略优化研究——基于不同审稿动力因素的比较视角  

Optimization of incentive strategies for scientific journal reviewers:Based on comparative perspective of different peer review motivation factors

作　　者：占莉娟 胡小洋[2] 叶冉玲 尹章池[1] 万可卓 ZHAN Lijuan;HU Xiaoyang;YE Ranling;YIN Zhangchi;WAN Kezhuo(Department of Journalism and Communication,School of Law,Humanities and Sociology,Wuhan University of Technology,122 Luoshi Road,Hongshan District,Wuhan 430070,China;Editorial Department of the Journal of Hubei University,368 Youyi Road,Wuchang District,Wuhan 430062,China;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,299 Bayi Road,Wuchang District,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学法学与人文社会学院新闻传播系,湖北省武汉市430070 [2]湖北大学学报编辑部,湖北省武汉市430062 [3]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北省武汉市430072

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2023年第5期601-608,共8页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目“开放数字环境下学术期刊同行评议质量控制体系构建研究”(21YJC860024);国家社会科学基金重点项目“内生型数字农家书屋的治理逻辑与实践路径研究”(21AXW007)。

摘　　要：【目的】发现不同审稿专家动力因素产生激励作用的差异,为期刊出版单位优化审稿激励策略提供参考。【方法】首先,运用文献调研法构建科研人员参与审稿的动力因素体系;其次,利用问卷法调研不同动力因素产生作用的差异。【结果】获取相关学术信息、了解同行状态、促使深度阅读、获取优先发表机会产生的审稿激励作用强,而物质回报、致谢信、DOI标注、第三方审稿平台的记录与认证、网上资源折扣的作用弱。学科、职称、审稿年限等特征不同的专家参与审稿的主要动力因素差异大。【结论】期刊出版单位应高度重视稿件本身产生的审稿激励作用;强化优先发表、进入编委会、提供学术动态策略,弱化物质回报、致谢信、DOI标注措施,避免低效投入,实现编辑部激励作用最大化;同时还需激发审稿专家作为学术共同体成员的责任感,方可确保其稳定持续的审稿意愿。[Purposes]This paper aims to find differences of the incentive effect of different peer review motivation factors,in order to provide references for the optimization of reviewing incentive strategy of journal publishing units.[Methods]First,we constructed the system of motivation factors of scientific research personnel in peer review by literature research method.Second,we used the questionnaire to investigate the differences in the effects of different motivation factors.[Findings]Obtaining relevant academic information,understanding peers'status,encouraging in-depth reading,obtaining priority publishing opportunities have a strong incentive effect on peer review,while material reward,letter of appreciation,DOI citation,record and certification of third-party peer review platform,and online resource discount have a weak effect.Reviewers with different characteristics,such as discipline,professional title,and peer review time,have great differences in peer review motivation factors.[Conclusions]Journal publishing units should attach great importance to the motivating effect of manuscript review generated by the manuscript itself;strengthen the measures such as priority for publication,entering the editorial board,and providing academic trends,and weaken the measures such as material reward,letter of appreciation,and DOI citation,so as to avoid inefficient investment and maximize incentive effects of the editorial department.At the same time,there is also a need to inspire the sense of responsibility of reviewers as members of the academic community,which helps to ensure that reviewers have a stable and continuous willingness to review.

关 键 词：审稿动力 审稿意愿 同行评议 审稿激励 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]