检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈霖 Chen Lin
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院
出 处:《财经法学》2023年第5期100-113,共14页Law and Economy
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“《民法典》体系下夫妻身份关系协议效力研究”(22YJC820005)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:无意思联络数人侵权不足以导致全部损害的,在满足“综合关联共同性”时存在连带责任的适用可能。为缓和全部连带的严苛性,我国在立法与司法上实质性地引入了比例连带责任,但仅限于特定原因力组合的案型。美国法上的混合责任与日本法上的部分连带责任在原因力类型多样化上的包容经验,为我国比例连带责任有条件地开放适用提供了有益借鉴。比例连带责任的本土内涵为“原因力相当”范围内的赔偿责任,构筑其启动条件时无需强调“原因力显著微小”这一要素。比例连带责任的运用主要从两个层面展开:对外向受害人进行比例连带时汲取传统连带责任的部分理论构造双重抗辩,对内向其他侵权人追偿时就实际清偿部分依照原因力比例划分最终份额。When the“comprehensive relevance commonality”is satisfied,it is possible to apply joint and several liability for the indivisible injury caused by independent torts.In order to alleviate the strictness of all joint and several liability,China has substantially introduced proportional joint and several liability in legislation and justice,but it is only limited to the specific combination of causal forces.The diversity of causation types of the mixed liability of the United States and the partial joint and several liability of Japan will promote the conditional and open application of proportional joint and several liability in China.The local connotation of proportional joint and several liability is compensation liability within the scope of“equivalent cause force”.It is not necessary to emphasize the element of“significantly small cause force”when constructing its starting conditions.The application of proportional joint and several liability is mainly carried out from two aspects:when carrying out proportional joint and several liability to the victim externally,refer to some theories of joint and several liability,and when recovering from other infringers,determine the final share according to the actual repayment share according to the share liability theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.200.28