真理符合论的模态解释困境及其出路  

Modality Account Problems for Correspondence Theory of Truth and Their Solutions

作　　者：胡兰双 刘叶涛 HU Lan-shuang;LIU Ye-tao(College of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2023年第5期45-51,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“意义与指称理论前沿问题研究”(21BZX04);南开大学人文社会科学基本科研业务费专项资金项目“真理符合论的新解——融贯符合论”(63222023)。

摘　　要：真理符合论在解释必然真命题时面临双重困境:一是世界上是否存在相应事实,使得这些真命题与之相符合?二是为什么相同的成真方式会让“真”具有不同的模态性质?化解这种双重困境的方案迄今可分为积极和消极两类。通过考察两类方案可以发现:“领域问题”不必然导致多元主义真理论,坚持“符合”为真的唯一核心属性亦可解释真性的差异;成真方式的不同与真性的不同之间不存在因果关系;“融贯”作为一种成真方式,并不与“符合”作为真的核心属性相冲突;符合论也能解释实用主义真理论的合理性。在坚持符合论一元论的立场下,积极方案既能化解符合论的困境,又能兼顾真概念的统一性,是较之消极方案的更优解。There are two problems in using the correspondence theory of truth to interpret the necessity of true propositions:whether there are facts in the world that make these true propositions correspond to;Why does the same way of being true leads to qualitatively different truths.There are negative solutions and positive solutions to solve these problems.Based on the analysis and evaluation of these two paths,it can be found that“the scope problem”does not necessarily lead to the pluralism theory of truth,and insisting that"correspondence"is the only core attribute of truth can also explain the qualitative difference of truth.There is no causal connection between the way of being true and the quality of truth;"correspondence"as a core attribute of truth does not conflict with“coherence”as a way of being true,and the correspondence theory of truth can also explain the advantages of the pragmatic theory of truth.Therefore,in the position of adhering to the monism of correspondence theory of truth,the positive path can not only solve those problems above,but also take into account the unity of the concept truth,which is better than the negative one.

关 键 词：模态 必然 真理符合论 积极方案 消极方案 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]