检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王世进[1] 林静 WANG Shijin;LIN Jing(Research Center of Environmental Resources Law,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000,China)
机构地区:[1]江西理工大学环境资源法研究中心,江西赣州341000
出 处:《治理现代化研究》2023年第5期88-96,共9页Governance Modernization Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“长江经济带生态环境协同治理的法治化研究”(21BFX023);江西省社会科学基金一般项目“生态产品财产权研究”(22FX17D)。
摘 要:近些年有不少环境犯罪案件存在罪责刑不相适应、同案不同判的问题,引发了社会舆论的高度关注。从环境犯罪案件的特殊性出发,分析轻刑化趋势中出现的困境来源于环境犯罪的行政从属性定位错误和过度强调刑罚预防功能。环境犯罪轻刑化趋势具有理论依据和现实需要。以提高环境法治效果为目标,环境刑事司法中应当明确环境法益、坚持宽严相济的刑事政策、增加法律解释检视程序、重视环境犯罪酌定量刑情节等。Many environmental crime cases have attracted high attention from public opinion,and the criminal responsibility and punishment are not compatible.Starting from the particularity of environmental crime cases,this paper analyzes that the difficulties that arise in the trend of leniency stem from the incorrect positioning of administrative subordination and excessive emphasis on the preventive function of punishment in environmen⁃tal crimes.The trend of leniency in environmental crimes has theoretical basis and practical needs.In order to improve the effect of environmental rule of law,this paper proposes that environmental criminal justice should clarify environmental legal interests,adhere to the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency,in⁃crease the review procedure of legal interpretation,and attach importance to the discretionary circumstances of sentencing of environmental crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.75.232