互文视野下的“断后篇”《起死》与晚年鲁迅历史意识之“变”  

The“Last Chapter”of Qi Si Under Intertextual Perspective and the“Change”of Lu Xun’s Historical Consciousness in His Late Years

作　　者：王开轩 WANG Kaixuan(Department of Chinese Language,Southwest University,Beibei Chongqing 400715,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学中文系,重庆北碚400715

出　　处：《泉州师范学院学报》2023年第4期52-59,共8页Journal of Quanzhou Normal University

摘　　要：《起死》是《故事新编》的压卷之作,也是理解《故事新编》的关键。但“阐释者”鲁迅的在场限定了《起死》的解读空间,《起死》更多以“《故事新编》之一”的面向出现,其“断后篇”的特殊性被隐没。实际上,作为压卷之作的《起死》与鲁迅过往思想轨迹构成潜在的对话关系,这种对话不仅涵盖《故事新编》的生成路径,更蕴含晚年鲁迅对民族心性的“再考察”。因此,从鲁迅作品内部的互文与外部历史现场的关联去把握《起死》的特殊性,成为理解《故事新编》及晚年鲁迅的一条路径,而木山英雄的鲁迅论正与这一脉络保持共振关系。Qi Si is the final work of The New Tale and the key to its understanding.However,the presence of Lu Xun,the“interpreter”,limits the space of interpretation of Qi Si,which appears more as“one of The New Tales”and its special character as a“Last Chapter”concealed.In fact,as the final work of the volume,Qi Si constitutes a potential dialogue with Lu Xun’s past trajectory of thought,a dialogue that not only covers the path of the production of The New Tales,but also contains Lu Xun’s“re examination”of national mentality in his later years.Therefore,to grasp the particularity of Qi Si from the intertextuality of Lu Xun’s works and the connection with the external historical scene becomes a path to understand New Tales and Lu Xun in his later years,and the Lu Xun theory of the Hideo Kiyama is in resonance with this lineage.

关 键 词：鲁迅 《起死》 《故事新编》 木山英雄 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]