从“文体通变观”论《知音》之诠释法则与效用  

On the Interpretive Principles and Effectiveness of“Zhiyin”from the Viewpoint of“Stylistic Flexibility”

作　　者：陈秀美 Chen Hsiu-mei(Department of Horticulture&General Education Center,Hungkuo Delin University of Technology,China Taiwan)

机构地区：[1]宏国德霖科技大学园艺系暨通识教育中心,中国台湾新北

出　　处：《语文学刊》2023年第4期10-20,共11页Journal of Language and Literature Studies

摘　　要：本文旨在从刘勰“文体通变”之核心观念基础,再论《知音》“六观”的议题,反思刘勰“主客辩证融合”的文体批评诠释法则与效用。从“通变观”与“观通变”的文体批评中,探讨刘勰如何以作者的博观(主观)与文体批评的“六观”(客观),来回应其所面对的时代问题,并借由《知音》“六观”作为六朝“文体解散”与“文质失衡”的救弊良方。故本文将重新厘析刘勰“六观”之义,进而论述“观通变”在刘勰“六观”中所具有的批评“位置”,解析其“望今制奇,参古定法”的批评准则。再则,阐述批评者的“博观”与文体批评的“六观”间,本就存在“主客辩证融合”的通变性,及其“三观通变”与“通变观”在刘勰“文体批评”中的诠释法则与效用。This article aims to discuss the issue of“Six Perspectives”in“Zhiyin”and reflect on the interpretative principles and effectiveness of style criticism fusion of objective and subjective discriminative criticism from Liu Xie’s core concept of“stylistic flexibility”.Therefore,this study will first focus on Liu Xie’s re-analysis of the meaning of“Six Perspectives”;then,it will discuss the placement of“View of Comprehensiveness and Changeability”in Liu Xie’s“Six Perspectives”,which exemplify the criticism principles of“looking at the present instances to restrict the oddity and referring to the ancient regularities to induce law”.Furthermore,this study expounds the flexibility of integrative objective and subjective discriminative criticism that exists between the critic’s“macro-view”and the“six perspectives”of stylistic criticism,along with the interpretative principles and effectiveness from“three views of change”and“flexibility view”in Liu Xie’s Stylistic Criticism.

关 键 词：刘勰 文心雕龙 知音 通变性 文体批评 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]