检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段克祥 徐广业 DUAN Kexiang;XU Guangye(School of Management,Nanjing University of Posts&Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003,China)
出 处:《物流科技》2023年第19期138-143,共6页Logistics Sci-Tech
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72071029);江苏省研究生科研创新计划基金项目(KYCX21_0843)。
摘 要:在竞争供应链中,研究了原材料价格风险、技术投入和竞争对制造商套期保值策略的影响。分别分析了制造商不套期保值策略和制造商套期保值策略两种情形,并结合制造商的技术投入,构建了各策略下的竞争决策模型。在此基础上,利用动态博弈理论对两种策略下的决策模型进行求解和分析,揭示了市场风险和技术投入对制造商套期保值策略的影响。研究结果表明,当市场风险较低时,不论技术投入成本的高低,制造商选择套期保值更有利;当市场风险适中时,随着技术投入成本的增加,套期保值策略更有利;当风险较高时,制造商选择不套期保值更有利。此外可以发现制造商在套期保值时的产品定价更高,而且技术投入能够给企业带来更高的利润。In a competitive supply chain,this paper examines the impact of raw material price risk and technology input on manufacturers'hedging strategies.We analyze the manufacturer's non-hedging strategy and the manufacturer's hedging strategy,and combine the manufacturer's technical investment to construct the competitive decision model under each strategy.On this basis,we use dynamic game theory to solve and analyze the decision-making model under the two strategies,revealing the impact of market risk and technical investment on the manufacturer's hedging strategy.The results show that when the market risk is low,regardless of the cost of technology input,it is more advantageous for manufacturers to choose hedging;when market risk is moderate,hedging strategy is more advantageous as the cost of technology inputs increases;when the risk is high,it is more advantageous for manufacturers to choose not to hedge.In addition,it can be found that manufacturers are hedging products at higher prices,and technology investment can bring higher profits to enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15