技术异质性视角下中国物流团体标准化效率评估及提升路径研究  

Study on Efficiency Assessment and Improvement Path of China’s Logistics Group Standardization from the Perspective of Technological Heterogeneity

作　　者：张宝友 黄妍 孟丽君 虎陈霞 ZHANG Bao-you;HUANG Yan;MENG Li-jun;HU Chen-xia(School of Economics and Management,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]中国计量大学经济与管理学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《北京交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期136-150,共15页Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“标准驱动的物流业高质量发展机理、路径及微观激励政策研究”(21BJY195)。

摘　　要：研究探讨中国物流团体标准化效率的整体水平、地区差异及其损失来源,有利于提升团体标准化能力以促进物流业高质量发展。在技术异质性视角下基于共同前沿理论构建Meta-Frontier-DEA模型,测算2015-2021年中国东部、中部、西部和东北部的物流团体标准化效率及其区域技术差距。研究发现:中国4个地区间的物流团体标准化效率存在明显差异,且效率损失主要来源各异,分属于保持现有水平型、整体提升型、群组内学习型和跨群组学习型四种类型。因此,应结合不同类型采取不同的提升对策:保持现有水平型的地区应该在保持现有技术水平和管理水平的基础上,微调团体标准化工作不足之处;整体提升型地区既要努力通过技术创新提升技术水平又要通过学习提升自身的管理水平;群组内学习型的地区应在保持现有物流团体标准技术水平的同时,注重提升内生动力,着力向群组内管理水平高的省市学习;跨群组学习型的地区需要在保持已有管理水平的同时,向群组外的技术水平先进省市学习,推动物流团体标准效率提升。Exploring the overall level,regional differences and sources of loss of standardization efficiency of China’s logistics groups is conducive to improving the group standardization and promoting the highquality development of logistics industry.From the perspective of technological heterogeneity,a Meta-Frontier DEA model was constructed based on the common frontier theory to estimate the standardization efficiency and regional technology gap of logistics groups in eastern,central,western and northeastern China during 2015-2021.The results show that there are obvious differences in the standardization efficiency of logistics groups among the four regions in China,and the main sources of efficiency loss are different,which can be divided into four types:current level maintaining,overall improving,intra-group learning and cross-group learning.Therefore,different improvement measures should be taken in accordance with different types:the areas that maintain the current level should fine-tune the deficiencies of group standardization on the basis of maintaining the current technical level and management level;The overall improving area should not only improve the technical level through technological innovation but also improve its own management level through learning;The intra-group learning region should not only maintain the standard technical level of the existing logistics group,but also pay attention to improving the internal motivation and focus on learning from the provinces and cities with high management level within the group;The cross-group learning region needs to learn from the technologically advanced provinces and cities outside the group while maintaining the existing management level,so as to promote the efficiency of logistics group standards.

关 键 词：技术异质性 团体标准化效率 技术差距无效率 管理无效率 

分 类 号：F253.9[经济管理—国民经济]